I didn't think you'd agree that moderate muslims are essentially non-practising or only partly accepting of the teachings.
So I guess if that is a moderate muslim, then I don't have anything against that.
But you can see that if someone did accept all the teachings that they'd be essentially an extremist.
So I guess the problem is that some muslims accept the whole teaching, which we seem to be in agreement is a bad thing.
I guess the next question is, should the teaching of Islam be re-written to remove the bad stuff?
To answer:
I do agree.
Okay.
Correct.
Pretty much.
In my opinion yes, remove the bad bits and no problem.
What I've been saying doesn't relate to this though; you said all Muslims at least don't disagree with ISIS, and this is wrong. Vast majority of Muslims do disagree.
If you look around, there are many anti-terror Muslim organisations. Our media is quite biased; in the aftermath of the 2005 bombings, a survey concluded that 88% of Muslims disagreed completely with the bombings.
Of course this was not reported, and the amount that did hold some sympathy with the bombers (something like 5% if I remember) was reported. This is still too high for this country, but is clearly a very small minority...