I didn't even insinuate that you're telling him to do anything(that's a remarkable leap by the way), I'm just pointing out how much of a farce it is in general that people will often jump to conclusions and act without thinking, which leads on to the following.
What I said in more simplistic terms is;
You said not to assume, I gave a counter argument to also not assume, if you're going to be throwing around things like..
but it might be worth it as it might well make him feel better
Sometimes it can. Like I said, you shouldn't be assuming how a person feels just because that's how you feel.
Can you not understand how you're not doing yourself any favours when multiple people think you're saying the exact opposite of what you're trying to convey.
Even if you later explain you don't condone it, those words sounds exactly like the sort of thing someone condoning it does. Next time just take the extra 10 seconds to type that.
Lastly as far as two reads of David's posts go, in this universe none of us knew this "chap" knew, not until after I stated it. I'm happy to be proved wrong because I missed that one sentence but I'm very sure he didn't mention it.
I mean go head, show me where he said that without an edited post, show me where I went wrong. Do it. David even said "Well he must have known".: That doesn't sound very affirmative if he isn't sure himself.
Seems like you typed up a nice long explanation to cover up your admission in there somewhere that you were wrong. I didn't say I did not not condone it either, I made no position at all...so another assumption on your part.
You see my very language in the part you quoted clearly shows that I am making no assumptions or judgements regarding either the OP or any moral or legal consequences as you can clear read the terms 'might be' and 'sometimes' therefore I made no assumptions so your comment was pointless and without merit. That people cannot read correctly is their problem not mine, perhaps they should take the extra 10 seconds to read it correctly.
David did say that his friend (who works with this guy) told him that the chap liked someone and it was 'complicated and he was off work going around the Lake District,' in his OP... This was obviously before you made your erroneous commentary. You did however explicitly state that I made an assumption that the guy knew in my statement and I quote"
"I like how you assume the new guy she's seeing even knows she was in a current relationship,"
This explicitly implies that I was referring to the OP, therefore contextually I was assuming a direct response and instruction to the OP...as I was not, I was countering something someone else said, it is largely unrelated to the OP's situation. I was neither making the assumption that the guy knew anything or giving advice to the OP on a course of action. The only way you could think I was making an assumption about whether the OP's girlfriends new fella knew she was in a relationship prior to theirs is to accept that I was directly responding to the OP. So no, it wasn't a leap at all...you made an erronous assumption due to either inability or not taking the time to process what was being said in the context presented and will not admit it. If you are now clarifying that you were not saying that I was assuming anything of the New Guy, then fair enough, although I'm sure if you are objective your statement does seem rather clear in its content.
So perhaps you should take your own advice before offering it to those that don't actually need it.

Last edited: