• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**

Scores added chaps and not one to brag but Team MLG (which was started about 2 months ago) have now over taken OcUK's benching team :D

If anyone fancies joining us, regardless of your skill level, we welcome all new members who enjoy running these kind of benches. All a bit of fun and feel free to send me a trust message :)

d13a025805785ef1e22d7de5b8f1feef.jpg


HiVizMan/Twisted1/Meankeys/Menthol are legends :cool: All the instructions for submitting a score can be found at MLG (click my sig link) :)
 
Pulse88 said:
Sick score of 8pack.
but why are 4 980 getting lower gfx score then 4 290x
(8 pack(no1) vs Wizerty(no3)):confused:

my guess would been more for 4x 980
Click to expand...

Because the scaling is ****.

3dmark says the core clock is 1858 MHz and it probably boosts way beyond 2000Mhz and yet if you divide the GS by 4 to see how much each card contributes its only about 16k GS, (Which silent_scone managed to do at 1500-1600 core clock).

Good score still, but really Nvidia? Live up to your "superior" driver hype ;)
 
Gregster said:
64005 on GFX is superb. Not sure where 4 290Xs have scored higher?
Click to expand...

Here.
1235489.jpg

But ofcourse it doesnt beat the 980s in total score because for whatever reason even with lower GS and lower or equal physics Nv setups score higher on Combined even though its just graphics tests ontop of physics :).
 
Last edited:
Rangerjr1 said:
Here.
1235489.jpg

But ofcourse it doesnt beat the 980s in total score because for whatever reason even with lower GS and lower or equal physics Nv setups score higher on Combined even though its just graphics tests ontop of physics :).
Click to expand...

Life in the old dogs yet i see. :)
 
I need to get some and run some benchmarks now i've got higher volts and power limit on my 970!

Wonder if I can crack the 15000 mark with this card
 
Last edited:
Silent_Scone said:
As said 4 way SLi scaling is poor at the moment


lol 5.262, how much vcore Ranger? :p
Click to expand...

Like 1.55v for 5.262GHz, why? lol

Edit: You refering to that xfire run? The CPU must've been unstable there because the physics seems a bit low actually for the clocks.

Edit 2: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3046543

Here's a score i did last night experimenting with my CPU, does a lot better on the physics :D
 
Last edited:
I know Rangerjr1 will have a pop over the CPU, however personal best so far with a single R9 290(P) X.

i7 [email protected] Ghz Water Cooled
290(P) Flashed to X @1,220 Mhz/1,536 Mhz Watercooled.

AMD 14.9 drivers

SCORE
11517 with AMD Radeon R9 290X(1x) and Intel Core i7-3770K Processor
Graphics Score 13988
Physics Score 10982
Combined Score 5116

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4504496?
 
CEUOTC said:
I know Rangerjr1 will have a pop over the CPU, however personal best so far with a single R9 290(P) X.

i7 [email protected] Ghz Water Cooled
290(P) Flashed to X @1,220 Mhz/1,536 Mhz Watercooled.

AMD 14.9 drivers

SCORE
11517 with AMD Radeon R9 290X(1x) and Intel Core i7-3770K Processor
Graphics Score 13988
Physics Score 10982
Combined Score 5116

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4504496?
Click to expand...

If you're maxing out the voltage on Trixx you can probably do 1600 on memory :), try it out! And yes you really really should OC that i7 more if you want higher scores, whats keeping you from doing it :D?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom