**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**

[Gregster]

Sick score of 8pack.
but why are 4 980 getting lower gfx score then 4 290x
(8 pack(no1) vs Wizerty(no3))

my guess would been more for 4x 980

64005 on GFX is superb. Not sure where 4 290Xs have scored higher?

 

[Gregster]

Scores added chaps and not one to brag but Team MLG (which was started about 2 months ago) have now over taken OcUK's benching team

If anyone fancies joining us, regardless of your skill level, we welcome all new members who enjoy running these kind of benches. All a bit of fun and feel free to send me a trust message

HiVizMan/Twisted1/Meankeys/Menthol are legends All the instructions for submitting a score can be found at MLG (click my sig link)

 

[CEUOTC]

i5 [email protected] Ghz Water Cooled
GTX 780 @1,188 Mhz/1,602 Mhz Aircooled.


344.16 drivers

SCORE
9534 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780(1x) and Intel Core i5-4670K
Graphics Score 11578
Physics Score 8049
Combined Score 4657

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3043089

 

[Rangerjr1]

Sick score of 8pack.
but why are 4 980 getting lower gfx score then 4 290x
(8 pack(no1) vs Wizerty(no3))

my guess would been more for 4x 980

Because the scaling is ****.

3dmark says the core clock is 1858 MHz and it probably boosts way beyond 2000Mhz and yet if you divide the GS by 4 to see how much each card contributes its only about 16k GS, (Which silent_scone managed to do at 1500-1600 core clock).

Good score still, but really Nvidia? Live up to your "superior" driver hype

 

[Rangerjr1]

64005 on GFX is superb. Not sure where 4 290Xs have scored higher?

Here.

Spoiler

But ofcourse it doesnt beat the 980s in total score because for whatever reason even with lower GS and lower or equal physics Nv setups score higher on Combined even though its just graphics tests ontop of physics .

 

[CEUOTC]

Rangerjr1 you appear to be a time traveller 2095! Fantastic GS score

 

[LtMatt]

Here.

Spoiler

But ofcourse it doesnt beat the 980s in total score because for whatever reason even with lower GS and lower or equal physics Nv setups score higher on Combined even though its just graphics tests ontop of physics .

Life in the old dogs yet i see.

 

[Silent_Scone]

As said 4 way SLi scaling is poor at the moment


lol 5.262, how much vcore Ranger?

 

[Gregster]

Here.

Spoiler

But ofcourse it doesnt beat the 980s in total score because for whatever reason even with lower GS and lower or equal physics Nv setups score higher on Combined even though its just graphics tests ontop of physics .

Fair one.

 

[stulid]

Rangerjr1 you appear to be a time traveller 2095! Fantastic GS score

It is not his submission.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2615468_wizerty_3dmark___fire_strike_4x_radeon_r9_290x_36976_marks

Here is a new top firestrike score with 4X980

http://hwbot.org/submission/2656743_smoke_3dmark___fire_strike_4x_geforce_gtx_980_40010_marks

Much higher graphics score on this one than packs.

 

[JamesM]

I need to get some and run some benchmarks now i've got higher volts and power limit on my 970!

Wonder if I can crack the 15000 mark with this card

 

[stulid]

8 pack was sandbagging

http://hwbot.org/submission/2656914_8_pack_3dmark___fire_strike_4x_geforce_gtx_980_40052_marks

 

[8 Pack]

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3041243

4 way 1950/2000 GTX980

MSI board and Cards!!! More in this one guys I can run four way 2000mhz!!

 

[Rangerjr1]

As said 4 way SLi scaling is poor at the moment


lol 5.262, how much vcore Ranger?

Like 1.55v for 5.262GHz, why? lol

Edit: You refering to that xfire run? The CPU must've been unstable there because the physics seems a bit low actually for the clocks.

Edit 2: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3046543

Here's a score i did last night experimenting with my CPU, does a lot better on the physics

 

[Deleted member 66701]

18869
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3052009

First run on watercooled SLI'd 970's
[email protected].

Let's see how much further we can get with a more volts when I figuire out the voltage table in the bios

 

[Fleshwerk]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4499645

On air
Single gtx 980
[email protected]

 

[Silent_Scone]

Like 1.55v for 5.262GHz, why? lol

Edit: You refering to that xfire run? The CPU must've been unstable there because the physics seems a bit low actually for the clocks.

Edit 2: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3046543

Here's a score i did last night experimenting with my CPU, does a lot better on the physics

Just wondered

 

[Gregster]

Scores all added

 

[CEUOTC]

I know Rangerjr1 will have a pop over the CPU, however personal best so far with a single R9 290(P) X.

i7 [email protected] Ghz Water Cooled
290(P) Flashed to X @1,220 Mhz/1,536 Mhz Watercooled.

AMD 14.9 drivers

SCORE
11517 with AMD Radeon R9 290X(1x) and Intel Core i7-3770K Processor
Graphics Score 13988
Physics Score 10982
Combined Score 5116

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4504496?

 

[Rangerjr1]

I know Rangerjr1 will have a pop over the CPU, however personal best so far with a single R9 290(P) X.

i7 [email protected] Ghz Water Cooled
290(P) Flashed to X @1,220 Mhz/1,536 Mhz Watercooled.

AMD 14.9 drivers

SCORE
11517 with AMD Radeon R9 290X(1x) and Intel Core i7-3770K Processor
Graphics Score 13988
Physics Score 10982
Combined Score 5116

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4504496?

If you're maxing out the voltage on Trixx you can probably do 1600 on memory , try it out! And yes you really really should OC that i7 more if you want higher scores, whats keeping you from doing it ?