Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 2,890
- Location
- Exmouth, Devon
So you got Titan cards for 4k but dont have 4k anymore becuase they are the only cards that ran it?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
So you got Titan cards for 4k but dont have 4k anymore becuase they are the only cards that ran it?
So you got Titan cards for 4k but dont have 4k anymore becuase they are the only cards that ran it?
The GTX 780 did not exist when the Titan launched and no one was aware that it was going to come after the Titan.
Rroff said:Be interesting to see whats actually coming, Titan and the possible Titan LE (which personally I reckon they might rebadge as something like the 780)
Won't be long till we see 4k 120hz tbh. .
true. up until now the connectivity was the problem. there are control boards that can handle that fine. Display port 1.3 can manage 120hz @4k and 8k resolutions too.
the problem is that IPS pixels cant switch fast enough beyond about 85fp so the rest is wasted hence gaming monitors being TN.
I will say though, I did make a mistake, as I was positive that the 780 6GB was a good 6 months ahead of the 8gb 290X, so hands up on that. I stand by the fact that I was talking about the 780 6GB not costing the earth, as iirc, didn't the Sapphire 8GB cost £700+ on release? Not that I care about price personally.
Fair enough, it might be a good idea to read and absorb the conversation and not throw silly reading comments about.
Payback will be a **** though.![]()
It was a 2 month difference
Ok seeing as this thread has well and truly gone off track, let me just clarify something, this discussion seems to be about the earliest card with enough VRAM to run 4k (regardless of the idea that no single card can really run 4K as they just don't have the grunt).
The currant leader seems to be the original Titan launched February 2013......correct ?
I will suggest an entry with this little puppy A good 7 months earlier
Ok seeing as this thread has well and truly gone off track, let me just clarify something, this discussion seems to be about the earliest card with enough VRAM to run 4k (regardless of the idea that no single card can really run 4K as they just don't have the grunt).
The currant leader seems to be the original Titan launched February 2013......correct ?
I will suggest an entry with this little puppy A good 7 months earlier
Well I like a good debate and thought this thread was going well but I didn't feel it needed to get personal like that
As for 4K gaming, the Titan has been available for nearly 2 years and in terms of longevity, that is a long time for PC hardware and it is still hitting tops in lots of the bench threads.
7970 tri and quadfire hit pretty high still, the drivers are so good and they scale so well on multiple cards that its not uncommon to catch up with titans.
I see you're not an underboss now, Greg?