what are your sources???!!
![]()
voices in his head
what are your sources???!!
![]()
I think he is getting confused with the Aussie issue last year...what are your sources???!!
![]()
Well if the shoe fits
Again, you are missing my point.
I was referring to the imbalance in media labelling regarding the cultural origins of the perpetrator in question, I obviously didn't make it clear enough in the first post, I don't think anybody who is a terrorist is mentally ill from medical perspective. I was speaking in the language of the media at the time to make a point (which you've apparently missed).
voices in his head
Yep, the voices are telling me there are 10 females:
Sophie;
Andrea;
Zari;
Louna (daughter of Sarah below);
Sarah;
Sandrine;
Sandy;
Noemie;
Esther; and
Dominique.
The 7 males are:
Jean Luc;
Samuel Isaac (daughter of Sarah above);
Mordechai;
Norbert;
Yossef;
Shmuel (son of Sarah above); and
Yohan.
The voices don't think you need to know their surnames or addresses either.
As I said, not official but I would think reliable.
You can and you can also justify mass killings within the right framework. The mental illness label for anyone who conducts a mass killing is lazy and naive.
Can you be a meat eater and still have empathy? If you follow an ideology where some people are less than you/sub human. Whether Nazi, Islamist... it is perfectly possible to massacre whithin that framework while not having any less empathy in general than say someone working in a butchers.
Not necessarily... if someone is mentally ill then it is quite correct to report that. You'll also find reports about concerns of the rise in extreme right wing views in Europe.
These terrorists are really going to denigrate the lives of Muslims living in France. If that estate they lived on had a bad reputation before I can't imagine living there now.
They can't be Christian... It's only Muslims that do this isn't it...?![]()
Bob next door told me there's 50 Gurkhas in there too. Apparantly he knows them from ww1 which is weird as he's only 20.
I think all of us when querying your sources wanted to know if your source was likely to have knowledge, we expected a simple proof they know what they're talking about not some attempt at being a smartass as justification.
Apologies for being a smart arse. As I mentioned, I believe my source(s) to be reliable.
The shoe certainly does fit the idea that people wanting power will do anything they can to get it, especially if they can use religion to persuade followers to join their cause. Doesn't matter what the religion or cause is...
Eh? The point that you are, oh so cleverly, making has exactly what to do with what's going on right now?
why does skynews display paris time and not ours?