Killing only who they want to, how civil.
Guess you also missed the * then?
But then again selective reading and hearing seems to be a trait a lot in this thread have so...

Killing only who they want to, how civil.
Guess you also missed the * then?
But then again selective reading and hearing seems to be a trait a lot in this thread have so...![]()
I'm glad the terrorists are dead.
Free speech > islam
I have no problem with people that strongly believe in something, religion or otherwise. However, please don't try and force your opinions on others. Instead save yourself the bother of planning an assault; stay at home and and blow your head off in the name of god at your own convenience.
Good god you really are stupid aren't you...?
I'll highlight the important star...
*for the hard of sight note the "", meaning I'm not actually calling them civil at all...[/SIZE]
Can you see it now?![]()
Guess you also missed the * then?
But then again selective reading and hearing seems to be a trait a lot in this thread have so...![]()
Playing devils advocate. Could the cartoons of Charlie Hebdo not be considered forcing opinions on others?.
Playing devils advocate. Could the cartoons of Charlie Hebdo not be considered forcing opinions on others? Western society in general could be seen as highly provocative to devout believers of all faiths.
The real point is there is no such thing as "multi culturalism". Although all people share a great deal in common, there are differences, some of them more contentious than others. In any society there will normally be a dominant culture, who should try their best to accommodate others, but if common ground can't be found, the majority voice must prevail, and they shouldn't feel guilty about it.
In my eyes the only people who can truly stand up to this and bring good their religion are other Muslims. Were they killed in the name of Islam for making satire of Mohammed or something?
I haven't read up on it because it angers me too much.
It should be the Muslim community who stand up and make public rallies asking for justice for those who stain the name of Islam. They need to make a stand as Islam is not a violent religion but as soon as a Muslim is seen they are looked down upon and feared. That is not how they should want to feel.
Instead, they merely pretend to be offended by cartoons, in order to give themselves a pretext to commit murder. Murder so horrifying, on a pretext so unWestern, that non-Muslims – blinded by grief and rage – turn on Muslims. Blame them. Persecute them. Burn their book, attack their mosques, threaten them in the street, demand their expulsion from Western societies. Actions that, in turn, scare Western Muslims, isolate them, alienate them. And thus drive some of them to support – and even become – terrorists.
Result: terrorists swell their ranks for a civil war they long to provoke non-Muslims into starting.
Millions of years of evolution says that humans of different colour/religion/political leaning etc. do not mix well.
I'd like to say it was a nice try but it wasn't.
Millions of years of evolution says that humans of different colour/religion/political leaning etc. do not mix well.
I'd like to say it was a nice try but it wasn't.
Look up Malmo.
It's only Sweden that is letting them do what they want. Even let them rape.
But they have a stupidly insane bat nuts lefty Government in right now and would probably join in on the antics.
They truly are nutters.
I feel sorry for most people there, including Muslims.
That's the trouble with pacifist nations when it comes to elections.
Playing devils advocate. Could the cartoons of Charlie Hebdo not be considered forcing opinions on others?
Keep going guys - keep playing into the hands of the terrorists and give them what they want.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...harlie-Hebdos-satire.-What-if-were-wrong.html
What is the purpose of the war the jihadist are trying to provoke?
The real point is there is no such thing as "multi culturalism",
"Civil" is entirely the wrong word. "Surgical" would be more apt even if you are being sarcastic.
You said you respected the Taliban cowards who murdered 130 kids as they were standing up for what they believed in and now you're praising these cowards in Paris for only shooting who they felt like shooting? You are only kidding yourself.
It's not missed, and no, you are not getting away with it with a couple of 'snide' quotation marks. FYI, That's the proper usage of quotation marks. Meaning, as in a sarcastic context, denoting the opposite effect. If you had any sense, you would not care on how politely they murder their way around an office. But you felt the need to point it out, didn't you.
There's no reason why cultures can't co exists, providing democratic will is adhered to by all.