Can. Perhaps. Did it? No.
Also the point still hasn't been made. It's all sidestepping.
IS were born out of the power vacuum created in Iraq.
Can. Perhaps. Did it? No.
Also the point still hasn't been made. It's all sidestepping.
Yes, it is quite simple actually. Just because someone claims to do something in "the name of" does not transfer blame nor responsibility onto that.
IRA - should all of the Irish be to blame for their terrorism? No. Of course not.
What bigoted nonsense you spout to fit your prejudice agenda.
Just watched the last segment of that video. It is HORRIFIC. Anyone wanting to watch it, really, DONT. Don't know how i'm going to get over watching that. Foolish thing to do.
There's one of three things happening here.
1. I haven't been clear in my point.
2. You're not understanding what I am saying.
3. Both of the above.
Not sure how me, a Muslim, saying Muslims should collectively stand against ISIS is bigoted nonsense.
Una Bomber is/was Christian. Should the Pope take up arms?
IRA - the Irish?
etc.
And who encouraged the mercenaries fighting against that regime?
they were fighting for the regime - did you completely miss all the news coverage or something?
Did you miss the part we we helped the "rebels"?
The IRA weren't engaged in a religious war.
Una Bomber is/was Christian. Should the Pope take up arms?
IRA - the Irish?
etc.
What a convenient little technicality you have there. So as long as they are fighting for a religious ideal, it is the fault of the religion. Yet if someone fights for a political ideal, it's nothing to do with that ideal. Do you realise how ridiculous that differentiation is? Rhetorical, as you obviously wouldn't have said it otherwise.
They still fought "in the name" of some ideology.
Besides which the troubles around the Orange March is very much a protestant vs catholic conflict.
I think you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
There's historical examples here. Fourth caliph fights against Khawarij extremists who were very much like the modern jihadi problem. Other Caliphs do the same. Islam as a religion dictates that rebels, extremist groups etc be brought under control.
You didn't say how I am a bigot.
Clearly the Irish should take no responsibility for addressing the IRA in your world.
There was sectarian violence but that was not the remit under what the PIRA and Sinn Fein operated.
Other parties calling themselves "the IRA" did. Next.
What a convenient little technicality you have there. So as long as they are fighting for a religious ideal, it is the fault of the religion. Yet if someone fights for a political ideal, it's nothing to do with that ideal. Do you realise how ridiculous that differentiation is? Rhetorical, as you obviously wouldn't have said it otherwise.
They still fought "in the name" of some ideology.
Besides which the troubles around the Orange March is very much a protestant vs catholic conflict.
I couldn't even imagine this level of evil before the rise of IS.
not quite medieval cruelty yet the most wicked and cruel torture devices ever invented by man are far worse than ISIS has done so far.
Just travel in time a few hundred years witness the Judas Cradle
![]()
You sit on that thing...
, Pear of Anguish, brazen bull or many more inventive ways to kill someone
Jihadi John is British. Why don't all Brits take a stand against him?