You've listed iPlayer so obviously your happy enough for the rest of us to fund your viewing![]()
That might be so but not the point I was making![]()
No, the point is your missing the point
BBC content whether live or on demand has to be paid for, if he's not paying £150/yr for it then majority of those that do think its reasonable enough value compared to for example Sky content or PPV have to pay proportionally more.
FYI The BBC Charter is up for renewal in 2016 so you may well find TV Licensing is enforced for on-demand content. I wouldn't be surprised if it is, on-demand is expected to be at parity with live consumption by 2020 and considering the charter runs for 10 years they'd be silly to overlook it.
That's not to say it'll be any different to not paying and still consuming live content now though, I know plenty of people who don't pay the TVL.
No, the point is your missing the point
BBC content whether live or on demand has to be paid for, if he's not paying £150/yr for it then majority of those that do think its reasonable enough value compared to for example Sky content or PPV have to pay proportionally more.
From what I last heard it doesn't matter if you watch the content but if you own a device capable of recieving any form of televised media PC, TV, Mobile, Tablet or otherwise you are now obliged to pay the TV licence.
From what I last heard it doesn't matter if you watch the content but if you own a device capable of recieving any form of televised media PC, TV, Mobile, Tablet or otherwise you are now obliged to pay the TV licence.
That'll never fly. There's no way i'm paying the BBC or for a license to watch shows through netflix or similar. They can't impose a tv license on things that aren't run, produced or aired by themselves. Applying the TV license to bbc content through the iplayer i can see happening, but not on demand content in general in the same way they won't let you watch film four etc without paying the tv license.