Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,715
- Location
- North
Well that's productive. So you think we should kill more innocent people to wind up jihadi types who then go on to kill more innocent people?
ISIS and Islamic militants - discussion
- Thread starter robfosters
- Start date
Well that's productive. So you think we should kill more innocent people to wind up jihadi types who then go on to kill more innocent people?
So hold on, how would you explain islamic terror attacks and murders against Japanese civilians? Japan has stayed out of things completely and yet their citizens have still been targeted.
They killed two hostages because there ransom demands were not met as Japan had pledged 200mil to fight ISIS. Japan has never been directly attacked by terrorists or so called jihadists.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,715
- Location
- North
Not all terror attacks are equal and have different motives behind them would be a reasonable start. also worth considering is these Japanese men would have probably been safe if the country had not been illegally invaded a decade or so before creating a breeding ground for extremism.
Oh so America and Britain killed those men! I see. Not extremist Islam.
Well they're the ones killing lots of innocent civilians at the moment not us.
At the moment perhaps. However I suspect it's rather easy to demonstrate we have our fair share of innocent lives on our hands.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 9,952
Yeah, and we're so proud of it.
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 4,698
- Location
- Wiltshire
Ohhhh god people still bang this drum?
You do realise iraq had lost its sovereignty? Of course you dont, youre too busy reading infowars.
ISIS are not Muslims their actions show this they can call themselves Islamic state, does not the change the fact they don't follow what Islam preaches. They are bunch of murdering psychopaths, it seems they kill anyone regardless of religion or race.
Last edited:
they're barely human.
Because they don't consider them fellow Muslims. Their particular brand of Islam is the only true Islam in their mind. This isn't all that uncommon amongst the religious, many evangelicals don't believe Catholics are Christian for example.
If you keep up with current affairs you will know there is a civil war taking place in Yemen. The 120 people killed belong to a religious sect who have taken over large parts of the country and disposed the ruling government and are fighting another religious group for control and power. So yeh basically a tit for tat attack.
of course they're not....
oh wait that is the argument they start with too, only they take it slightly further and decide that because X group are 'not Muslims' then they can be killed
Not talking about ISIS in general.
when terrorists claim they are doing attacks because of Iraq or Palistine ...why do so many ignore that but just latch onto their claims of them being muslims ?
I'm not saying they aren't muslims but some seem to focus on them being muslims more than their given reasons for the attacks.
I'm not sure they do per say... depends what you mean - some Palestinian 'terrorists' attacking Israel for example I'm not sure there is as much focus on Islam per but rather one group of people fighting another
on the other hand some random attack in the west loosely justified because non-Muslims have done something in Muslim lands - Iraq etc.. well the fundamentalist ideology is pretty key there
on the other hand some random attack in the west loosely justified because non-Muslims have done something in Muslim lands - Iraq etc.. well the fundamentalist ideology is pretty key there
Because that's what the media like to do these days, they seem to jump on the Muslim bashing band wagon. Some media use this to complete ignore what they are fighting for just brand them as Islamic terrorists.
Last edited: