The FreeSync/ActiveSync system governs how frames with variable refresh intervals are generated by the GPU and sent over DP to the scaler in the monitor. It has absolutely zero to do with how the scaler delivers an image to the LCD panel. AMD can offer advice, but ultimately the responsibility to make sure that's done right lies partially with the scaler designers and partially with the monitor manufacturer. FS certification just ensures the monitor supports variable refresh when connected to a suitable AMD GPU.
With the way FS capable scalers and monitors have been rushed to market it's inevitable they'll have some issues at the start. That's one of the down-sides of an open standard like ActiveSync.
Was AMD right to build on ActiveSync rather than going with a locked-down proprietary solution like GSync? Six months from now FS monitor designs should be pretty solid, with all the major issues worked out. But GSync will still be a proprietary system with a significant cost disadvantage, and history records those almost never gain any real market acceptance.
You've just repeated my point back to me.
AMD could have spent a bit of extra time to work out the kinks with the involvement of the scaler makers and monitor makers, they could have made freesync a competetive product to gsync, ultimately AMD control the freesync brand and have done nothing to protect it.
If you want to go by history, just look at how many AMD3D branded/supported monitors are still on sale vs. 3DVision. The exact same sloping shoulder approach to 3D support means you currently have to buy 4 separate products from 4 separate companies, none of whom guarantee any sort of support for each other's products.
AMD are palming off the majority of the R&D budget on to scaler makers and monitor makers and what we are seeing so far is that they haven't been willing to spend the extra R&D to develop the products themselves, where as they are perfectly willing to buy a ready made scaler from nvidia and just pass on the extra cost (and then some) to consumers.
R&D is a risk, nvidia have taken the risk with gsync, but no one on the AMD/VESA/Scaler makers side is currently willing to take that risk (obviously AMD's lack of GPU sales is a big factor on that side).