The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

[uksoldierboy]

I just ran those clocks with a [email protected]

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5284067

Graphics score - 17208

Wtf lol something is definitely amiss then.

 

[whyscotty]

You're confused

I ain't got a clue


This is a stock run

GFX score - 16376

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5254501

 

[uksoldierboy]

What version of windows Scotty?

 

[whyscotty]

8.1 mate

 

[uksoldierboy]

Same here, yours fully updated?

 

[whyscotty]

Aye, updated this morning.

 

[jupiter_man]

2 Fury X card is due today!

 

[Gerard]

Certainly finding it odd there are/have been reports of a few shipments of sapphires since release but ocuk is sticking with the 17th date.

Mine was sent out from CK this evening.

Really lol again never knew that haaa so do OCUK get there stock from here?

Doubt it, probably have their own distributors.

Nice. Let us know if your get one with the moulded pump cover.

Will do.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

Mines supposedly due around the end of the month, so wonder how likely it is to be a revised pump

 

[Boomstick777]

Mines supposedly due around the end of the month, so wonder how likely it is to be a revised pump

Good luck, hopefully you get a good one, just in case have some protection ready

 

[Gregster]

Review is done

I also started a new thread, just because I want it to stand out

 

[Kaapstad]

Review @Hardware Slave placed in OP.

http://www.hardwareslave.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/graphics/xfx-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/

 

[Mei]

Review @Hardware Slave placed in OP.

http://www.hardwareslave.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/graphics/xfx-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/

wow that one makes it look super bad compared to the Ti

also "it is a little fresh out of the back to truly challenge the GTX 980 Ti."
is that rly a saying? first time i hear it lol

 

[Kaapstad]

Review is done

I also started a new thread, just because I want it to stand out

Nice review and copied into the OP.

 

[Kaapstad]

wow that one makes it look super bad compared to the Ti

also "it is a little fresh out of the back to truly challenge the GTX 980 Ti."
is that rly a saying? first time i hear it lol

With driver optimising the Fury X could end up a little faster than a 980 Ti @2160p and a little slower @1080p, at the moment it is early days and this is only my guess.

 

[Mei]

With driver optimising the Fury X could end up a little faster than a 980 Ti @2160p and a little slower @1080p, at the moment it is early days and this is only my guess.

lol mabe i just thought that review made the fury look p00p
all the graphs showing double or more fps on the Ti
*shrug*

 

[Deleted User 234324]

Ib think with driver optimisations it will pull ahead at all resolutions, at 1080p it's CPU starved and 2160p its not so much with improvements it should edge out ahead of the TI/TX

 

[Deleted User 234324]

Review @Hardware Slave placed in OP.

http://www.hardwareslave.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/graphics/xfx-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/

Clearly they are totally unbiased in that review.

 

[Kaapstad]

Ib think with driver optimisations it will pull ahead at all resolutions, at 1080p it's CPU starved and 2160p its not so much with improvements it should edge out ahead of the TI/TX

With HBM I think there are lots of advantages but one draw back is the low clockspeed that bottlenecks performance a bit @1080p. At higher resolutions the low clockspeed is not a problem and the HBM can take advantage of it's very wide bus.

 

[Mei]

Clearly they are totally unbiased in that review.

they did say they had a faulty unit but seems kind of wrong to focus on results that are not representative of its real performance
looked more like they were just angry and wanted to make the Ti look twice as good lol

@kaap i dont think worthy of more clicks! ><