It does not look like a very good review and the way they have presented the results does suggest they may be a bit biased. They definitely used the old graph trick, not having 0 for the minimum lol.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
It does not look like a very good review and the way they have presented the results does suggest they may be a bit biased. They definitely used the old graph trick, not having 0 for the minimum lol.
Soldato
Nice review
Ditto, was fair.
I liked that joke about liking AIO coolers too
Batman actually runs quite well on the Fury for me at 4k, not too choppy at all.
Last edited:
Soldato
Kaaps could you do me a favor please bud, could you run fire strike standard @1110/500? Want to see your gpu score and how it compares to mine at the same clocks.
I will do but it will be a couple of hours as I have to get one into a PC.
Soldato
Thanks pal I appreciate it, my gpu is about 16,500 at those speeds, but others seems to get much higher, around 17,000-17,500.
Associate
Is that true?They own ocuk so not a competitor
Soldato
Soldato
Seems about ballpark for those clocks. Hows yours above that though Kaap? 1110 is about my limit without juice.
Whyscotty, are you running your 3DMark through Steam? I am, and I know UKSoldierboy is. I don't normally, but only just set this system up so not bothered to move the key over. Graphics score seems to be far better
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
So basically their review is pointless as it's not representative of the actual card then. So why publish it if only to hurt AMD
Permabanned
So anyone will run some Stereo 3D Heaven benchmark for me ??
Associate
Kool, so we can talk about their products and availability without fear of annihilation?
Soldato
Hmmm, there's quite a difference then between your scores and mine, maybe a fresh driver install will help.
Yeah I'm running through steam, does using the steam version come with a performance penalty?
Review @Hardware Slave placed in OP.
http://www.hardwareslave.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/graphics/xfx-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/
That is the most ridiculous review I've seen. Only about 100 points difference in Firestrike Ultra but the bar graph has been made to look like the Ti is 7 x faster. Crysis 3 4K only 5fps for FX...wtf.
How do such sites get away with?
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 57
That is the most ridiculous review I've seen. Only about 100 points difference in Firestrike Ultra but the bar graph has been made to look like the Ti is 7 x faster. Crysis 3 4K only 5fps for FX...wtf.
How do such sites get away with?
Thanks for that feedback, I helped with this and the graph looks visually bias, it’s a bit of an issue but I will ask for that to be sorted. The text does mention it is not too much of a gap but to be honest, you are right and your feedback is appreciated.
Last edited:
No, not thru Steam.
Associate
I am running two 7970's with a 4K screen, and want AMD I am going to be holding off till FURY X2 8GB comes along one slot great power.
That a good Idea peeps.
That a good Idea peeps.
Soldato
That is the most ridiculous review I've seen. Only about 100 points difference in Firestrike Ultra but the bar graph has been made to look like the Ti is 7 x faster. Crysis 3 4K only 5fps for FX...wtf.
How do such sites get away with?
Did anyone notice they were using true 4k res, ie 4096 x 2160 and not the UHD 4k that most monitors use. I agree the graph Y axis is a bit suspect!
Last edited: