To people who would have only voted Conservative anyway.
Well I have been a Labour Party supporter for 41 years but not anymore. Only a fool backs a loser.
To people who would have only voted Conservative anyway.
Wow! man from Surrey likes living under a Tory administration - who'd have predicted that eh?![]()
Well I have been a Labour Party supporter for 41 years but not anymore. Only a fool backs a loser.
...Labour have only won 4 general elections in those 41 years. You've backed the loser an awful lot for someone who has issue with it.
Wow! man from Surrey likes living under a Tory administration - who'd have predicted that eh?![]()
Ugh, Abbot on the frontbench...i'm never watching parliament again.
yuk - a vile woman.
Hypocrite, for sure.
Sorry that I work and contribute to society. No person in full time employment in the uk can claim they would have been better off under labour than the last conservative government. Love the comment though, nice contribution.have one back.
Was only a matter of time
...Labour have only won 4 general elections in those 41 years. You've backed the loser an awful lot for someone who has issue with it.
Sorry that I work and contribute to society. No person in full time employment in the uk can claim they would have been better off financially under labour than the last conservative government.
The front bench will all the richer for the inclusion of the infamous Abbot eye-roll
There's a difference between Corbyn being elected by Labour supporters in an internal election, and a Corbyn-led Labour being elected by the whole national electorate. Given that Labour lost the last election, they have to get quite a lot more votes than they did in the last one, and critically, have to do it in seats they lost in 2010 or '15. If they just shore up votes in seats they currently hold, it does absolutely nothing to put Labour in power, and gains them no extra seats. The only way they win power, are "electable" is if they can take quite a few seats in constituencies they just lost, or failed go regain.
For Labour to be electable, they have to take seats all over the place, but most notably in the South and South-East, and/or in Scotland. Good luck with Scotland. The notion that a Corbynite left wing Labour will do better than a Miliband Labour in Tory heartland South and South East seems .... optimistic.
Of course, if a week is a long time in politics, then four and a half years is an eternity. Only time will tell. It just seems unlikely.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/14/opinion/paul-krugman-labours-dead-center.html?_r=0
Fantastic piece by Krugman, shows how inept those for austerity are.
I have supported Labour longer than that, though not as a party member. I count 7 election victories since 1963.
There is a world of difference supporting a party that you think has a chance of winning to supporting a party you're sure has no chance - hence my comment.
Interesting interview with Yanis Varoufakis on newsnight (around 35 minutes) about Corbyn's election, several people today have been saying that Labour are going to attempt to ally with left wing parties all over Europe in order to push for some much needed EU reforms rather than just accepting whatever Cameron decides to negotiate leading up to the referendum. I think that's probably the main reason he's here at all.
I don't see anything finger-waving about quoting what she said of herself, which was where my assertion that she's a hypocrite came from. She quite openly admitted it. Her words, not mine.Imagine all that finger waving.