Not even a last meal?
Fine, they get fed to the pigs, then the pigs get fed to the next inmate, who gets fed to more pigs, etc.
Not even a last meal?
There is only one murderer in this case and you know who that is.
Then how does he die if no one murders him?
Then how does he die if no one murders him?
He has been sentenced to death by judge, jury and anyone registered as a citizen of the state.
If a majority agrees someone should die, does that make it it OK and not murder?
While I see the the disaster of this, I'm also a proponent of hard federalism and that somewhat requires an ultimate penalty, but its still murder... You can't sugar coat it, regardless of who the victim is...law surrounding murder in general is bloated with pointless trivialities to reduce sentences and increase payouts.
An executioner executes him on state orders.
One of the things that defines murder is the unlawful killing aspect, sanctioned execution is legal.
You are quite correct, but murder, specifically, is a legal term defining an unlawful killing, not a "right" one. For instance, get involved in a drunken scuffle, give someone a shove and they fall, crack their head open and die, is it murder? No, because of lack of intent. Though it might very well be manslaughter (murder 2 in the US). It is unlawful killing, but lacks the requisite intent for murder in the UK, or murder 1 in the US. Or, someone attacks you on the street, you defend yourself using reasonable force and they die, is it murder? No, because self-defence using reasonable force is a legal way to kill someone.Just because something is legal, somewhere on this planet, does not make it right.
Just because something is legal, somewhere on this planet, does not make it right.
I don't fully understand why far right groups have such a issue with Jews,
I'm assuming they are using Hitler as a role model and perpetuating his thinking, but that was 80 years ago and it was pretty irrational at the time.
I've even less of an idea why an American white supremacist would care about such a group when pragmatically Hispanics are more numerous.
It is the US Blacks who really hate Jews.
I don't fully understand why far right groups have such a issue with Jews,
I'm assuming they are using Hitler as a role model and perpetuating his thinking, but that was 80 years ago and it was pretty irrational at the time.
I've even less of an idea why an American white supremacist would care about such a group when pragmatically Hispanics are more numerous.
In those circles i believe Jews are believed to be the main organizers of migration into white countries.
Why would Jews want (for example) millions of people who hate them to suddenly migrate to Germany and have better lives?
As for America, if anything they should try to preserve the (white) political status quo from which they benefit the most.
Playing disparate groups off each other is one way of staying alive, if all those groups start looking the same then Israel is toast.
David Cameron has said he has Jewish ancestors. In a speech to the Knesset, the Israeli Parliament, the Prime Minister said his great-great-grandfather was a Jewish man from Germany.
While speaking to a 500-strong group of Jewish lobbyists in London in 2007, UK Prime Minister David Cameron declared,(1) “I am a Zionist“. He went on to add, “I’m not just a good friend of Israel but I am, as you put it, good for Jews.”
While speaking to a 500-strong group of Jewish lobbyists in London in 2007, UK Prime Minister David Cameron declared,(1) “I am a Zionist“.