Influential persons of the year, not good/best people.
ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.
- Thread starter RoboCod
- Start date
Influential persons of the year, not good/best people.
What other side is that?
I think you posting it proves my point rather that detracts from it.
Soldato
How the hell did she get that?
Soldato
OMG are you acting thick or?
One guy says nice things and the other doesn't. You loved what the one guy said. Now what about what the old vet said?
Sorry I rescind this. A proper use of irony is crediting Deuse with far too much intelligence.
I'm not sure of the relevance this has outside of your bigoted narrative.
The fact that they were Muslim or indeed Asian seems completely irrelevant, and the actual outrage is that a gang of young people attacked an old man who happened to be a Veteran.
Unless you can of course prove that they attacked him because they're Muslims, terrorists and jihadis.
I don't think I'm the one being thick here
Exactly.
The whole point of the article I published is to say don't tar everyone with the same brush
Which is exactly what you seem to be trying to do in the article you published.
The face of honour.
The problem is as a parent you naturally want to care and nurture (ideal world) but when they turn out severely bad - I suspect if you're position in society is directly linked to your kids and what they do, then I suspect you're under pressure to really distance yourselves for the family safety.
In the end you instil moderation but as they're an adult there's not much more you can do - hence if they're that far gone, you either be damned for supporting them or damned for disowning them.
I think in middle east terms this is equivalent speak for publicly disowning under the social pressure of the community.
If there's not much you can do.. you have to focus on the safety of the remaining family members.
it is quite likely he was targeted because they're Muslims and he was wearing clothing that identified him as a veteran - they're hardly superficial factors
like if a bunch of white guys with shaved heads attacked a black kid, those factors aren't irrelevant - they do indicate possible motives
Soldato
I don't think I'm the one being thick here
.
So you won't comment on what Old Vet said. We know your agenda now. Thanks.
Which just shows that that gang of youths are morons, not all asian/muslim youths or white youths with shaved heads are morons
Which is all the article originally posted, that deuse has an issue with, is trying to say
deuse said:
Great, I'm glad to see your comprehension skills are improving slightly as I've hardly been obfuscating about my agenda
Soldato
It's a supposition pushed by a website with an agenda, and reposted by a person with bigoted views. The fact is we don't know. Yes it's a real possibility but because it's anti-Muslim Deuse, and others, will take it at face value and not even question the source. It could simply have been a gang of kids hanging around who saw the opportunity to mug an old fellow walking through the park.
Last edited:
Caporegime
lol, Time.
Rather than point scoring, perhaps just post some more gumpf about the evil West working their policy of terror and execution of innocent people. Or as I said, why are you not also posting about the indirect weapons that the Russians and Syrians are using? It would after all add some balance to your bias.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 7,586
Anti ISIS? From the signs it looks more like a "Islam dindu nuffin" march.
It's hardly point scoring, its showing you that you have completely misinterpreted what I am saying and that I have no bias. You can try and shrug me proving you off as point scoring but lets face reality here, you were wrong, why don't you just man up and admit that instead of doubling down on something that you have just been proven wrong about, its the more grown up thing to do.
Soldato
I'd didn't, ISIS represents Islam as much as the US represents peace and democracy.....