just seen Merkel won times person of the year.....another disturbing thing is the leader of isis was runner up...what the hell.
Influential persons of the year, not good/best people.
just seen Merkel won times person of the year.....another disturbing thing is the leader of isis was runner up...what the hell.
"Mr Gill described the mocking gang tearing at his beret, replete with regimental cap bade, as “like a pack of dogs would a piece of meat” before running off laughing"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/11/u...eran-on-his-way-to-remembrance-sunday-service
And here's the other side. Do you think that Vet is wrong?
just seen Merkel won times person of the year.....another disturbing thing is the leader of isis was runner up...what the hell.
What other side is that?
I think you posting it proves my point rather that detracts from it.
The irony is strong with this one.
I'm not sure of the relevance this has outside of your bigoted narrative."Mr Gill described the mocking gang tearing at his beret, replete with regimental cap bade, as “like a pack of dogs would a piece of meat” before running off laughing"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/11/u...eran-on-his-way-to-remembrance-sunday-service
OMG are you acting thick or?
One guy says nice things and the other doesn't. You loved what the one guy said. Now what about what the old vet said?
I'm not sure of the relevance this has outside of your bigoted narrative.
The fact that they were Muslim or indeed Asian seems completely irrelevant, and the actual outrage is that a gang of young people attacked an old man who happened to be a Veteran.
Unless you can of course prove that they attacked him because they're Muslims, terrorists and jihadis.
Its grim we live in a world where a father has to think things like that, and for it not to be a far fetched idea.
I'm not sure of the relevance this has outside of your bigoted narrative.
The fact that they were Muslim or indeed Asian seems completely irrelevant, and the actual outrage is that a gang of young people attacked an old man who happened to be a Veteran.
Unless you can of course prove that they attacked him because they're Muslims, terrorists and jihadis.
I don't think I'm the one being thick here
.
it is quite likely he was targeted because they're Muslims and he was wearing clothing that identified him as a veteran - they're hardly superficial factors
like if a bunch of white guys with shaved heads attacked a black kid, those factors aren't irrelevant - they do indicate possible motives
deuse said:So you won't comment on what Old Vet said. We know your agenda now. Thanks.
Don't worry your card is marked
it is quite likely he was targeted because they're Muslims and he was wearing clothing that identified him as a veteran - they're hardly superficial factors
like if a bunch of white guys with shaved heads attacked a black kid, those factors aren't irrelevant - they do indicate possible motives
just seen Merkel won times person of the year.....another disturbing thing is the leader of isis was runner up...what the hell.
Mayhaps you need to learn to read?
Anti ISIS? From the signs it looks more like a "Islam dindu nuffin" march.How weird, surely there isn't a conspiracy to paint a particular narrative ?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...am-media-outlets-say-organisers-a6765976.html
Rather than point scoring, perhaps just post some more gumpf about the evil West working their policy of terror and execution of innocent people. Or as I said, why are you not also posting about the indirect weapons that the Russians and Syrians are using? It would after all add some balance to your bias.
Anti ISIS? From the signs it looks more like a "Islam dindu nuffin" march.