Skoda

quartz grey metallic ?

This colour:

t7rSxn0.jpg
 
Any major differences apart from some extra bhp and some ghastly alloys?

On top of the vast range of equipment featured in the standard vRS, the 230 gets

  • bigger brakes
  • a touchscreen with navigation
  • parking sensors
  • rear privacy glass.
  • new sports exhaust system
  • Mechanical changes are limited, yet they do make a difference and include a rejigged ECU for an extra 10bhp (up to 227bhp) and a new electro-mechanical limited-slip diff
  • 19-inch rims, a rear spoiler, gloss-black grille and door mirrors plus optional red 230 decals on the sills.
 
For those leasing, are you doing this privately or through a business?

I'm a public sector worker so leasing privately looks quite expensive.

Thoughts?
 
Unless you do eleventy billion miles a year look seriously at the 1.4 TSI instead. Same torque, more horses, very similar real world economy (40 round town, 50+ on a motorway run). In fact if you do a lot of town work - unlikely given you're looking at the 1.6 CR - the 1.2 TSI is ample.

I've been window shopping for the past 6 months or so and sadly in the local used market the 1.4TSI (preferred choice) is much less common than diesel engine on the estates, and thus tends to work out more expensive to purchase (depending on state of the market at any given time).

For example if I search Autotrader for Elegance trim up to 3 years old, there is only a single TSI in the whole country priced under £16.49k, compared to the whole first page of diesels being under £12.5k. Not suggesting they are directly comparable, but you get a lot more choice. Just 3 miles away there's a 2.0TDI well under £14k. This is all understandable especially due to ex-fleet vehicles typically being diesel, but what it does mean is that it feels like getting a secondhand 1.4TSI mk3 estate at a sensible price is harder than it should be. Buying new on the other hand it is a different story as you aren't left paying a premium for petrol.
 
Back
Top Bottom