#freekesha
- Thread starter dowie
- Start date
Not just any quiche, free quiche, ah!
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 32,911
- Location
- Rutland
Mmmmm I could force myself on some quiche right now.
lol. so very wrong.
I'm conflicted between laughing and organising a protest on your front lawn.
it also seems they had a big falling out - he'd told her to lose weight etc...
apparently it isn't so easy to market her when she's hit her late 20s and looks like that....
'Victims' like these think they're changing the world and 'speaking out' or whatever else happens in their dreamworlds. When they're finally forced to grow up, get jobs and get real, you better start loving those white men as they'll be everywhere.
I find this "trial by Twitter" society to be pretty awful. TBH I don't believe her story and I think if the Judge in her civil rape case says the same thing there will be a lot of very famous people who should be ashamed of their actions.
Here's what bothers me about the case -
If she was raped why hasn't she gone to the police?
If she was raped why is only suing Dr Luke in a civil case?
If she was raped why didn't she tell anyone until 2015 when her contract negotiations weren't going her way?
If she was raped then why did she say nothing in 2011 during a Legal deposition?
If she was raped then why did her mother also say nothing in 2011 during a Legal deposition?
If she was raped then why did her mothers text message say "release her from her contract or we'll claim sexual assault"? which is obviously the reaction of a rape victims mother.
If she was raped then why doesn't she want to see Dr Luke in jail, where he can't do the same thing to other young women?
If she was raped why does she only want money from a civil case as compensation for the rape?
To me, this whole case seems to be purely an excuse to get out of the contract by creating such a social uproar that Sony, via Dr Lukes production company which is who she actually has the contract with, decide it's not worth the fuss.
However, to be fair to both sides, if Dr Luke is found guilty in a court of law then I will happily apologise, even if I don't understand why she took the route she did rather than via the police.
Here's what bothers me about the case -
If she was raped why hasn't she gone to the police?
If she was raped why is only suing Dr Luke in a civil case?
If she was raped why didn't she tell anyone until 2015 when her contract negotiations weren't going her way?
If she was raped then why did she say nothing in 2011 during a Legal deposition?
If she was raped then why did her mother also say nothing in 2011 during a Legal deposition?
If she was raped then why did her mothers text message say "release her from her contract or we'll claim sexual assault"? which is obviously the reaction of a rape victims mother.
If she was raped then why doesn't she want to see Dr Luke in jail, where he can't do the same thing to other young women?
If she was raped why does she only want money from a civil case as compensation for the rape?
To me, this whole case seems to be purely an excuse to get out of the contract by creating such a social uproar that Sony, via Dr Lukes production company which is who she actually has the contract with, decide it's not worth the fuss.
However, to be fair to both sides, if Dr Luke is found guilty in a court of law then I will happily apologise, even if I don't understand why she took the route she did rather than via the police.
Last edited:
Have you been on twitter this last week?
I'm not even going in to the rest of this post, nor any other in this thread, as I know nothing about this case, and it seems a little pointless to pour complete speculation on top of yet more complete speculation.
However, for the quote above, you must surely have an idea of any one of the many, many reasons victims don't just go to the police?
Careful what you say, if you deny rape three times in front of the mirror you'll summon hurfdurf.
Lol!
(OCUK should use the forum software where you can tag other user IDs in posts like that
)