And you completely miss the wider point.
yup i couldnt answer your question, i didnt even know isis had different branches let alone name any.
And you completely miss the wider point.
yup i couldnt answer your question, i didnt even know isis had different branches let alone name any.
I'm glad you disassociate yourself from the actions of the IRA. From my own memory I see little difference between Muslims at large Now and Irish Catholics at large during the period that the IRA were active terrorists.
I don't recall Irish Catholics, leaders of the church etc apologising for/denouncing IRA actions at the time, though I was relatively young during that period so perhaps they were active in denouncing the violence on mass and I just missed it?
Someone makes a claim and i ask for proof to back up their claim.
I didnt want to discuss other stuff so why wud i answer to it
Well your wrong, only the most blind fool would defend or rationalise the actions of isis. Remember they target everyone who disagrees with them and usually that is Muslims. I wonder who these Muslims are who talk to you, sound like a bunch of grovelling idiots.
So you're unwilling to enter into discussion yourself but you're happy to make demands of numerous posters then throw in a few insulting remarks when you don't hear the answers you want to hear... That is borderline trolling.
Well that learned me didn't it. A person on the internet is telling me I am wrong because his experience is different and my associates and friends are grovelling idiots. You'll appreciate if I don't seek to continue debating your point.

So you're unwilling to enter into discussion yourself but you're happy to make demands of numerous posters then throw in a few insulting remarks when you don't hear the answers you want to hear... That is borderline trolling.

i didnt insult anyone, if people felt hurt then *insert witty comment here but not insulting*
borderline trolling because i asked for proof and didnt want to discuss other matters which i was not interested in..............................
i wont even comment further as my posts seem to be getting deleted a fair bit.
borderline trolling because i asked for proof and didnt want to discuss other matters which i was not interested in..............................
i wont even comment further as my posts seem to be getting deleted a fair bit.
You can't really have it both ways, the question asked of you was more or less the reverse of the one you demanded others answer. You're interested enough in the topic when you're making demands of others yet you dodge the question yourself and resort to making snide comments or leaving the thread when challenged... that isn't discussion it is borderline trolling. If you're getting posts deleted by a third party then perhaps there are others who consider that sort of thing to be trolling too.

I'm glad you disassociate yourself from the actions of the IRA. From my own memory I see little difference between Muslims at large Now and Irish Catholics at large during the period that the IRA were active terrorists.
I don't recall Irish Catholics, leaders of the church etc apologising for/denouncing IRA actions at the time, though I was relatively young during that period so perhaps they were active in denouncing the violence on mass and I just missed it?
i expect you to provide proof for the same source as those others who follow islam, the quran.
a book you should know since you feel billions of muslims are missing knowledge you have
Classic 'but white people' 'but Christians'.
If you can't remember it, perhaps it's something you should look up? Google may help.
I'll give you a head start. When Googling the 'condemnation of the ira' the very first result states 'despite formal condemnation by the Roman catholic hierarchy'.
What you're also missing the point on yet again (starting to think it's intentional) is that the ira were not a religious faction, they did not carry out their acts in the name of catholicism. They just happened to generally be catholics since it's the predominant religion in Ireland, or at least was.
Theirs was a civil/attempted war of independence. They carried out their disgusting acts with a political agenda. Not a religious one.
Classic 'but white people' 'but Christians'.
If you can't remember it, perhaps it's something you should look up? Google may help.
I'll give you a head start. When Googling the 'condemnation of the ira' the very first result states 'despite formal condemnation by the Roman catholic hierarchy'.
What you're also missing the point on yet again (starting to think it's intentional) is that the ira were not a religious faction, they did not carry out their acts in the name of catholicism. They just happened to generally be catholics since it's the predominant religion in Ireland, or at least was.
Theirs was a civil/attempted war of independence. They carried out their disgusting acts with a political agenda. Not a religious one.
Well that learned me didn't it. A person on the internet is telling me I am wrong because his experience is different and my associates and friends are grovelling idiots. You'll appreciate if I don't seek to continue debating your point.
Yes if you google for Denouncement of the IRA you can find that Leaders did, as I pointed out my recollection as a youngster was that it was no more apparent than Muslims denouncing ISIS. To that point if you google for Muslim leaders denouncing ISIS you can find this interesting post.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/08/21/muslim-leaders-have-roundly-denounced-islamic-s/200498
As to separating Religion from the troubles in Northern Ireland and with the IRA, suggesting it was a purely political agenda, just wow.
As for the "But Christians" it's not but Christians it's but terror, be it from an attack fighter over Syria or a ISIS supporter in a truck.
And just wow why? Show that religion was the driver. You won't be able to because it simply wasn't. The ira don't want everyone to be catholic. They want a united Ireland free of British rule. That is their mandate. Simple as that.
Religion came in to it because both the Republic and northern were deeply religious countries with differing denominations. One the traditional Irish religion, the other a sign of loyalty to the British crown.
Religion was a way to identify an opponent but it wasn't a goal or objective.
Well perhaps coming from the community you talk about I know more then you do...