Indeed, which is why I find it surprising he continues to steam into arguments thinking he does. You'd think repeatedly being proven wrong would dissuade that behaviour.
Seriously?
You have proof that police officers won't be expected to investigate/uphold ridiculous future laws relating to internet criminality?
You have proof that newly criminalised activity (namely internet criminality such as female ejaculation) is not going to be included in new police education/training? Nor expected to be upheld or investigated?
I think that is absolutely marvellous. I honestly do. I'd love to see some of this proof so I can stop worrying about the continuing demise of society.