So much bellyache over specs.
Newest Zelda looks great and has been shown running very nicely. I'm more concerned with battery life than raw performance.
The problem is a catch 22.
Gamers are driven by spec, always have, especially at the start of the console before it is released, people can only base it on spec.
Sales leads to user base. User base leads to 3rd party support. 3rd party support lead to games.
Games leads to more sale.
The Wii was a one off, it tapped into people who never buy video games thus never care about specs, like our parents. The switch is targeting both gamers, and the new mobile gamers. If the mobile games don't see any benefit in getting better looking games than they can on their iPad or Galaxy, why would they buy a Switch? If it doesn't look as good as a Xbox One that is now 3 years old and you can get one now for £200. Why pay more for something that runs slower on paper?
What you will probably end up with is the core Nintendo sale user base which is around 10 million mark. Which basically translate to Wii U part 2.
The only scenario where the Switch sells BIG yet with a low spec is all these casual gamers who likes to play on the move sees something in it that they can't get it from their iPhone or can't get it on their PS4.
1 Zelda game and a Mario game is never going to shift 50 million consoles.