OcUK Staff
- Joined
- 23 Feb 2015
- Posts
- 2,518
- Location
- Overclockers UK HQ
So you have gone from ""In theory, slavery in Islamic law does not have a racial or color component, although this has not always been the case in practice." in your defence of Islam, to the above for Christians. Can you please quote in the Bible that Christian law has a racial or colour component of slaves, so you are at least consistent?![]()
Papal Bulls were Catholic law...
Here is an example for you:
Dum Diversas (English: Until different) is a papal bull issued on 18 June 1452 by Pope Nicholas V. It authorized Afonso V of Portugal to conquer Saracens and pagans and consign them to "perpetual servitude".[1][2] Pope Calixtus III reiterated the bull in 1456 with Inter Caetera (not to be confused with Alexander VI's), renewed by Pope Sixtus IV in 1481 and Pope Leo X in 1514 with Precelse denotionis.
Where by the saracens were a distinct racial group from the region of the northern sinai peninsular. It later grew into a term encompassing all muslims.
If you want to go into the African slave trade, The Southern Baptists used the bible to justify white supremacy and the continuation of the slave trade even after the Catholics had denounced the practice.A link to the reporting of that event.
"It is significant that the proslavery appeal was always to the authority of the
Bible and never to the spirit of Christianity." - The Religious Defense of American Slavery Before 1830 - Larry R. Morrison
In more general terms, not specifically racial justifications: Harvard Divinity School's Jacob K. Olupona states that "Christianity was deeply culpable in the African slave trade, inasmuch as it consistently provided a moral cloak for the buying and selling of human beings."
If you want an example of racism from the bible then just go straight to the parable of "The Good Samaritan". A piece of the most repulsive racist twaddle that belittles our faculties ever written.
Last edited: