There's a longer version of the video here:
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/police-in...r-125840443.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=fb
Difficult to properly comment when even the video above only shows part of the interaction between the man and police (i.e. what caused the Taser to be drawn?) but the option to de-escalate and calm things down was there. The actual use of Taser didn't seem proportionate to the threat at that moment; they'd pushed him back and despite his resistance there are other methods available for containing that, even a red dot and verbal escalation if necessary. It'll be interesting to see how this one pans out.
Also not sure why the headline is "their own race relations advisor", he doesn't work for the police.
The valid use of the taser seems to be the crux of the matter to me. Should they have used it or not? I don't believe they were under immediate threat at that point and it was just to aid an arrest. Using a firearm for that seems disproportionate to me.
