Shots fired outside parliament - Please refrain from speculative and antagonistic posts
- Thread starter Mr Jack
- Start date
Nothing surprises me about the DM. They did afterall call the most senior judges in the UK "enemies of the state"
After reading the article (i feel unclean) it appears to be calling for Twitter, Youtube and Facebook to do more and ban all this kind of islamic recruitment stuff (they do have one point about Youtube making advertising money on the many video clips of the incident)
I guess this will be the first of many headlines leading up to May introducing internet censorship like China.
After reading the article (i feel unclean) it appears to be calling for Twitter, Youtube and Facebook to do more and ban all this kind of islamic recruitment stuff (they do have one point about Youtube making advertising money on the many video clips of the incident)
I guess this will be the first of many headlines leading up to May introducing internet censorship like China.
Please tell me that's an actual joke image.
Also why would they need a manual
. Sadly I have a joke for sickipedia after reading that 
.
Please tell me that's an actual joke image.
Also why would they need a manual
I hope it is..
if not then there's no hope
I mean what manual do you need? sit in a car, drive it into people.
I wonder if people who write those actually sit down and go "yeah, yeah, that totally makes sense, good jerb little buddy!"
I hope it is..
if not then there's no hope
I mean what manual do you need? sit in a car, drive it into people.
I wonder if people who write those actually sit down and go "yeah, yeah, that totally makes sense, good jerb little buddy!"
No its true I am afraid. If you read the article it says the handbook says you should use a heavy as vehicle as possible and be armed with knives to go killing after you crash.
Soldato
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11,698
- Location
- Surrey
Our media is more dangerous than any single terrorist.
Such poor taste and disgusting exploitation of a recent horror for the sake of a fear mongering and shocking article. Our media runs wild with bias, fake stories, hate mongering, fear mongering and defaming. If they go too far, a tiny back page apology is all they do to make things right.
There should be more restrictions or stricter consequences for the media.
Such poor taste and disgusting exploitation of a recent horror for the sake of a fear mongering and shocking article. Our media runs wild with bias, fake stories, hate mongering, fear mongering and defaming. If they go too far, a tiny back page apology is all they do to make things right.
There should be more restrictions or stricter consequences for the media.
Just confirmed, the daily mail front page today is 100% genuine and NOT satire !!!
Source = http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-39375921
Source = http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-39375921
Yeah my stomach turned with her comment about all liberals mean by multiculturalism is that we all die together.
WOW!
The daily mail really outdone itself today!:
To think it's one of the U.K's biggest selling 'newspapers' is pretty terrifying !
No it isn't. Maybe the truth about Google should be made known to an even wider audience.
Can't blame them as it now appears that Google are only interested in taking money for advertising and don't give a hoot about whether it pays for terrorism , racism and anything else obnoxious. I hope they lose hundreds of millions for allowing this to happen.
Looking forward to wise words from Google lovers on how wonderful they are..... not...
It's worrying! Almost as bad as Fox news.I must admit I thought it MUST be satire, but I did some extra searches and as far as I can tell it's genuine
brilliant! DM is a joke! I'm shocked at how many people take that newspaper seriously
Well an awful lot of people do and still believe the EU banned bent bananas etc. Thats the danger, many many people take the DM as their only source of facts each day and believe every word.
Katie Hopkins is now be sourced and quoted across the states as a true Englishwoman who has dared tell the truth about how the majority of Britains feel.
Woe is me.
I assumed satire until the edit. So google are at fault for what others post?
Maybe I'm giving them too much credit but I doubt terrorists are searching Google for manuals and if they were I'd hope the security services would flag them quickly.
2 minutes seems like a long time though. I guess it reflects on their ability to fact check articles that they're so poor with googling.
I can think of a few posters here who I'd happily read any articles they write. Sadly I can think of many more that defeat my hopes of improving DMs qualityMaybe GD should take it over. Just imagine how popular that would be.
.