Some debate here:nonsense
and as pointed out above it isn't actually spherical either
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10763/is-earth-as-smooth-as-a-billiard-ball
Also, I said nothing about shape, only about smoothness.
Some debate here:nonsense
and as pointed out above it isn't actually spherical either
I'd say it's impossible to really know, given that we can't exactly measure it.This is because it spends most of its time bouncing off stuff on the way to the surface. Also, the average is 40,000 years not 170,000.
To which you replied:
and then:
When you wrote "that clock tower" in reply to SexyGreyFox's post (which you quoted in your reply), weren't you referring to "that clock tower"?
Some debate here:
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/10763/is-earth-as-smooth-as-a-billiard-ball
Also, I said nothing about shape, only about smoothness.
I'd say it's impossible to really know, given that we can't exactly measure it.
Well, yeah, but 40,000 to 170,000 is barely one order of magnitude, so as estimates go it doesn't make much difference.well, it can be estimated given what we know about physics, so its likely to be pretty close.
Saw this one on QI
A neutron star is the smoothest object/surface in the universe. Its tallest mountains are no more than 0.1-5 mm big compared with the vast size of... well being a star.
![]()
Sackbut is the old name for Saxophone
In the late 1800s a baboon names Jack was employed the the railroad as a signalman in Cape Town. He never once made a mistake and worked for the rail company until his death.
Well, yeah, but 40,000 to 170,000 is barely one order of magnitude, so as estimates go it doesn't make much difference.
I randomly came across some Banana Facts today which I found quite interesting.