Images of items I have purchased (except trainers [no feet pics])

Spook187 said:
But it's just a bag lol, to much faffing about these days with basic stuff, look at Raymond he never really made it as a photographer hence why he ended up doing weddings and pics of coffee cups :D
Click to expand...

'just' a bag...JUST a bag...

€77 worth of bag I'll have you know :p

How about this then?

2.jpg


:D :p
 
arctine said:
Why did it take two people to photograph a bag?
Click to expand...

This is what i wondered previous, can two people serve a copyright on a single product, or single photo?
Shouldn't it be a joint copyright, or a joint enterprise.
Never understood that, understand why it is being done, but don't understand how it applies.
 
Copyright technically belongs to the person who took the photograph. Adding the mark there seals the deal.

Basically either Ana or me took that photo (and all the rest) - it covers us both.
 
Hikari Kisugi said:
Yes but two people can't take a photo thats my query.
So how can you both copyright, isn't that a conflict generated immediately.
Click to expand...
We aren't both copyrighting. Only the person who took the photo can claim ownership of the photo. It's more of a legal ass covering than anything. With the "well its got X name on it" approach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom