Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,192
There goes all the Vega stock and RRP



Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
There goes all the Vega stock and RRP![]()
![]()
This guy optimized monero Vega, supposedly his "Vega FE is twice as profitable mining Monero as a GTX 1080Ti mining Ethereum"
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6lz1q6/vega_owners_club/djxpnhn/
He is actually fair maybe a little bit leaning towards Amd but not muchNot being a rabid Nvidia fanboi means being biased? Ok.
Hopefully Lisa is smart enough to make that decision. This is gold mine considering Fe priceAMD and Nvidia are probably working on segmenting mining away, somehow.
In the mean time if Vega FE is profitable than AMD will happily skew production to that line, starving the gaming market but increasing their revenue...
He is actually fair maybe a little bit leaning towards Amd but not much
+1Largely he plays his audience - he was very very pro-AMD for awhile but with the flow of things lately has taken a more central approach (partly I think due to picking up a much larger audience lately and wanting to keep it so trying not to alienate either extreme) - I suspect it will modify again depending on trends, etc. down the line.
+1
Not that I listen to it, just what I hear from what people say here. These days I just wait for cold hard facts rather than lapping up rumours and speculation. I get enough of that just browsing this thread anyway![]()
There goes the reasonably priced idea gone, What price AMD sets wont really matter if they are gobbled up by miners market price will soar
That's crazy that means RX Vega is going to be even more so by a significant amount be more profitable than anything nvidia has.
So expect higher RX Vega prices and hard to find stock i guess.
Seems a very reasonable analysis and expectation:
- Slightly above a GTX 1080
- Decently above it in optimised DX12/Vulkan games
- More power use, and hotter
- Likely nip at the heels of the 1080 Ti in a year, and in highly optimised low-level games
So yeah, if that level of performance and potential come in at £450, AMD probably have a winner on their hands.
That is based one one game alone though. It is odd that Doom keeps being used and seems to be the only game that appears favourable (to a point) in benchmarks.Seems a very reasonable analysis and expectation:
- Slightly above a GTX 1080
- Decently above it in optimised DX12/Vulkan games
- More power use, and hotter
- Likely nip at the heels of the 1080 Ti in a year, and in highly optimised low-level games
So yeah, if that level of performance and potential come in at £450, AMD probably have a winner on their hands.
I come for the entertainmentI'm surprised you're in this thread then.
It's amazing how many posts this and the last thread has generated when you consider how little solid information there has been.
Because even a non scientific calculator will run doom well, that's whyYeah why use DOOM all the bloody time, why not use one of the many other Vulkan games out there ?
![]()
So am I right in thinking this is about what we know so far: Should be somewhere between a 1080 and a 1080ti once drivers are sorted, but nobody will be able to buy one because all the miners will have them on top of the fact that HBM2 will make stock low and the price expensive to start with?
All this just makes the 1080ti more appealing, and this is comming from somebody with a freesync monitor who wants a fury-x replacement...
It would indeed. Although not quite as much funThere is a lot of hyperbolic speculation in this thread based on click-bait.
The sensible thing to do would be to wait for real RX Vega reviews.