” I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men
and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. "
He is literally saying biological differences lead to different abilities(and preferences) in the tech field and leadership in general.
Do you agree with that?
I do because it's true! The average woman and the average man may not be all that different in terms of mental aptitude but there's two things to consider....
Source
1) the distribution of male inteligence is wider than women, whoose intelligences are distributed closer to the mean.... Men, as a group, have more stupid examples and more geniuses
This plays into 2) which is is apex fallacy.... by concentrating on elite sectors of industry (ceo's Google programmers etc) on one hand whilst comparing it to the simiar average (mean) inteligences of men and women many will say that the disproportionate amount of men at the top is the result of sexism whilst ignoring that the distributions are different with more men at the top (and bottom) of the scale. Strangely certain people don't like to have this pointed out to them when people try to talk about the men's issues that are disproportionattely affecting the men at the lower parts of the scale 'what about the menz' gets trotted out by the usual suspects
That deals with with aptitude side of things.....
Now onto behaviour.......
Now women and men, as groups, clearly do not behave in the same way.... Sexual selection has shaped human behaviour much like it has for pretty much for all other animals that reproduce sexually on earth. You only have to look at accidents, incarceration and suicide rates for starters to see this.
And don't accept the argument that this is down to 'socialisation' (alone) it's total bull#### when Europeans went to the new world, Africa and Australia did we find any humans not in definded gender roles? Did we find men largely performing the same roles of hunter gatherer /warrior whilst women did the majority of the domestic and child rearing work or not?
Am I to assume that proponents of the socialisation hypothesis for gender roles believe that some how all men across the world decided to agree on similar gendered roles and managed to enforce them over millenia and thousands of miles?
The difference in behaviour in terms of jobs pursued is actually often worse in more egalitarian countries like in scandanavia where women and men are free to pursue jobs better matched to their personal proclivities as opposed to less egalitarian countries where more women go into stem professions or start their own businesses as thats the best way for them to get on in their societies