google employee's internal diversity memo goes viral

Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
Giving birth? Motherly desire to be with child? Less time to spend gaining experience?

Jesus christ, the man is trying to improve the world of work for everyone, not just women and now hes fired.

Me and a girl at work are at a similar grade, of a similar age, she's actually paid slightly more. Me and her were having a chat and she said she can't wait to be a mother, she feels like that's her main purpose in life and her career is a side thing. I wonder where we'll both be in 20 years.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Posts
9,315
Me and a girl at work are at a similar grade, of a similar age, she's actually paid slightly more. Me and her were having a chat and she said she can't wait to be a mother, she feels like that's her main purpose in life and her career is a side thing. I wonder where we'll both be in 20 years.

Too many women have bought into the fairytale myth that they can "have it all", where the truth is that no one can. There just isn't time. If you want to have a family and be there for them, you won't build a big career. If you're building a big career and working all the time to do it, you can't be there for your family. Women seem to have the option to bail out and have a work life balance that makes more sense without being harshly judged for it as a man is.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
Too many women have bought into the fairytale myth that they can "have it all", where the truth is that no one can. There just isn't time. If you want to have a family and be there for them, you won't build a big career. If you're building a big career and working all the time to do it, you can't be there for your family. Women seem to have the option to bail out and have a work life balance that makes more sense without being harshly judge for it as a man is.

I don't think she feels like she can have it all, I think she feels like work just isn't her main focus, she wants to do well at work no doubt, but that's always going to be a secondary thing to having children. Based on my experience that's probably the case for a lot of women, not all, but a lot. For me as long as there aren't barriers for women who want to do well then that should be enough. Artificial targets are just going to harm the economy in the long term.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
6,590
have you read the whole memo?

Let's face it, none of the raging lefties have. I considered myself left at one point, not anymore....

They just want an excuse to bang on about diversity is strength and discrimination is how we'll achieve it!

Cult if I ever saw one.....

Edit: Oh yeah and we'll make up a crappload of nonsense to back up our farcical points.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
handing them off to third parties to care for them is very unkind for the child (Perfect for a crony capitalist society however), the memo implies it somewhat.


what's hilarious is this exact argument is always said to be a policy of comunist/cultural Marxism societies.


I always find it funny how both sides always accuse each other of the same thing
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
32,747
what's hilarious is this exact argument is always said to be a policy of comunist/cultural Marxism societies.


I always find it funny how both sides always accuse each other of the same thing

Depends on what the motive is, clearly childcare is a racket.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Posts
3,717
Location
UK
Maybe, for example, Sebastian Loeb was partially inspired into rallying by watching Michele Mouton. I don't know if he did, but the timing is right - she was a famous rally driver when he was a child. If he did admire her ability and was inspired by it, why is that so completely wrong?

Bit of a babe to ;)

mmouton3.jpg
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
Depends on what the motive is, clearly childcare is a racket.


it's just funny how on one side its

"government forcing both parents to work so they can raise thier kids in the communist care system"

and the other

"government forcing both parents to work so they can cream money from child care"
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
32,747
Well i'm sure there's a comfortable middle ground that doesn't require the children being veritable melons by the time they have to also work and continue the cycle of family destruction.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
Well i'm sure there's a comfortable middle ground that doesn't require the children being veritable melons by the time they have to also work and continue the cycle of family destruction.


look at the rat utopia experiments.


im not saying humans are anything like as simple or extreme as rats but there are strong parallels to western society (and any developed society) where there is true abundance for most people.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
32,747
look at the rat utopia experiments.


im not saying humans are anything like as simple or extreme as rats but there are strong parallels to western society (and any developed society) where there is true abundance for most people.

Well giving people a chance to do other things with their time rather than spending 80% of it in a specially designed office (tech firms ******* love these ergonomic/hollistic living offices), then maybe people would care a bit more about the society they live in.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Jan 2009
Posts
6,563
” I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men
and women differ in part due to biological causes
and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. "

He is literally saying biological differences lead to different abilities(and preferences) in the tech field and leadership in general.

Do you agree with that?

I do because it's true! The average woman and the average man may not be all that different in terms of mental aptitude but there's two things to consider....

Source

1) the distribution of male inteligence is wider than women, whoose intelligences are distributed closer to the mean.... Men, as a group, have more stupid examples and more geniuses

This plays into 2) which is is apex fallacy.... by concentrating on elite sectors of industry (ceo's Google programmers etc) on one hand whilst comparing it to the simiar average (mean) inteligences of men and women many will say that the disproportionate amount of men at the top is the result of sexism whilst ignoring that the distributions are different with more men at the top (and bottom) of the scale. Strangely certain people don't like to have this pointed out to them when people try to talk about the men's issues that are disproportionattely affecting the men at the lower parts of the scale 'what about the menz' gets trotted out by the usual suspects

That deals with with aptitude side of things.....

Now onto behaviour.......


Now women and men, as groups, clearly do not behave in the same way.... Sexual selection has shaped human behaviour much like it has for pretty much for all other animals that reproduce sexually on earth. You only have to look at accidents, incarceration and suicide rates for starters to see this.

And don't accept the argument that this is down to 'socialisation' (alone) it's total bull#### when Europeans went to the new world, Africa and Australia did we find any humans not in definded gender roles? Did we find men largely performing the same roles of hunter gatherer /warrior whilst women did the majority of the domestic and child rearing work or not?

Am I to assume that proponents of the socialisation hypothesis for gender roles believe that some how all men across the world decided to agree on similar gendered roles and managed to enforce them over millenia and thousands of miles?

The difference in behaviour in terms of jobs pursued is actually often worse in more egalitarian countries like in scandanavia where women and men are free to pursue jobs better matched to their personal proclivities as opposed to less egalitarian countries where more women go into stem professions or start their own businesses as thats the best way for them to get on in their societies
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2005
Posts
28,851
Location
Canada
Construction and many others. I didn't say men flock to them but if a significant part of the job market is inaccessible to women, it's natural for them to focus on different parts of the market, such as jobs which require degrees.

Don't agree there. A significant proportion of modern construction doesn't require much significant physical ability. Things like electricians, plumbers, crane and other vehicle operators to name a few, even then many of the more physical jobs could be done by a significant proportion of women as well, for example bricklaying. Your body adapts, both for men and women.

It's another example of an industry that is dominated by one sex, both by the historical views (men work in construction, women work in nursing) and the culture that goes with it. It's stereotyping.
 

J.T

J.T

Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Posts
3,227
Location
Earth
Don't agree there. A significant proportion of modern construction doesn't require much significant physical ability. Things like electricians, plumbers, crane and other vehicle operators to name a few, even then many of the more physical jobs could be done by a significant proportion of women as well, for example bricklaying. Your body adapts, both for men and women.

It's another example of an industry that is dominated by one sex, both by the historical views (men work in construction, women work in nursing) and the culture that goes with it. It's stereotyping.

Yeah, has nothing to do with the fact that most woman (note I said most not all!) just don't want to do those types of jobs...
 
Associate
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Posts
2,332
Don't agree there. A significant proportion of modern construction doesn't require much significant physical ability. Things like electricians, plumbers, crane and other vehicle operators to name a few, even then many of the more physical jobs could be done by a significant proportion of women as well, for example bricklaying. Your body adapts, both for men and women.

It's another example of an industry that is dominated by one sex, both by the historical views (men work in construction, women work in nursing) and the culture that goes with it. It's stereotyping.

You haven't got a clue about how physically demanding construction is. You really haven't.

I'm an electrician and consider myself in very good physical shape. I work out and I ride a road bike regularly, yet I return home from work absolutely battered. By Thursday I'm flagging and thankful that I've prepared my working week so that by Friday I'm doing some testing and inspection rather than knocking chunks out of walls again.

Plumbers retire from work with wrecked knees.

Brick laying. Absolutely hilarious. I can guarantee that you've never picked up a trowel in your entire life.

Your body doesn't adapt, it recovers. Over and over again. I'm 35 and have pains in my fingers every once in a while, pins and needles. Doctors say it is the early onset of arthritis. That's because the job does damage to your body and I'm a relatively very healthy male, doctors agree.

Women don't adapt to these conditions they suffer. They get more repetitive strain injuries, more broken bones and more tired out.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
27 Apr 2013
Posts
4,095
You haven't got a clue about how physically demanding construction is. You really haven't.

I'm an electrician and consider myself in very good physical shape. I work out and I ride a road bike regularly, yet I return home from work absolutely battered. By Thursday I'm flagging and thankful that I've prepared my working week so that by Friday I'm doing some testing and inspection rather than knocking chunks out of walls again.

Plumbers retire from work with wrecked knees.

Brick laying. Absolutely hilarious. I can guarantee that you've never picked up a trowel in your entire life.

Your body doesn't adapt, it recovers. Over and over again. I'm 35 and have pains in my fingers every once in a while, pins and needles. Doctors say it is the early onset of arthritis. That's because the job does damage to your body and I'm a relatively very healthy male, doctors agree.

Women don't adapt to these conditions they suffer. They get more repetitive strain injuries, more broken bones and more tired out.

Yes, I was about so say the same. Most of these jobs are physically challenging in some way or another. Spending all your days reaching under floorboards to run pipe or cable is just not something most women are robust enough to endure if they have a choice. Which thanks to a fairly generous welfare system, they do.
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2005
Posts
28,851
Location
Canada
If it doesn't fit the dogma then it has to go in the bin. I'm afraid the political Left has been hijacked by high minded, ultra liberal graduates that gravitate in their own circles and bleat into their echo chambers. They have become completely detached from reality.

I think a few people really need to hear the story of The Emperor's New Clothes.

And the politics right have been hijacked by the alt right.

Where does it leave us that are in the middle? ;)
 
Associate
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Posts
2,332
Yes, I was about so say the same. Most of these jobs are physically challenging in some way or another. Spending all your days reaching under floorboards to run pipe or cable is just not something most women are robust enough to endure if they have a choice. Which thanks to a fairly generous welfare system, they do.

I had a female apprentice once. She was a nice kid, keen to learn, everything you want from an apprentice. So I took her on to site and showed her the ropes. It blew her mind how hard the job was, eventually she just decided that it was too much, not for her. I knew it was coming, when she was struggling to lift the smallest drums of cable, chase boxes into walls. The vibrations from the power tools, the bite from a power drill when it gets caught and tries to rip your arm off. Even the biggest toughest guys can get their wrist yanked out by a drill getting caught.
 
Back
Top Bottom