Caporegime
You didn't answer my question about why Mourinho plays Mata in the same position?
PS. your team selection theory is wrong.
You're very confused about position and role Trusty. They're not the same thing.
You didn't answer my question about why Mourinho plays Mata in the same position?
PS. your team selection theory is wrong.
I can't speak for Mourinho, he didn't pay £38m for him at a time when we were crying out for players in other positions and we dont play as rigidly in Mourinho's 4-3-3 than we did under Moyes where Mata was trapped out wide, however now of that really detracts from the main points of Moyes failure and I have no idea why people are so keen to find reasons why his time in charge wasn't a complete disaster and even more strangely attempt to blame a man who won the title with the squad for his successors inability to win with the same squad.
You are making me doubt my team selection thing but I have vivid recollections of discussing it on another football forum where it was stated that he didn't pick the same back four in successive games never mind the same eleven, I absolutely stand corrected if that wasn't the case though.
Absolutely, Van Gaal wasted a fortune but if nothing else it demonstrated that the owners were prepared to back the manager despite people suggesting the opposite under both Moyes and Ferguson to the extent that when Ferguson said he was never refused money for a player he was accused of lying.
You're very confused about position and role Trusty. They're not the same thing.
I don't get it. You said Moyes doesn't know how to play certain players, yet Mourinho is playing Mata in the same way?
Like I said in my 1st post, you can't call his tenure a disaster because he didn't have a year to sort out who he wanted, which players to buy, he had a short summer window, with David Gill leaving as well meant that things were going to be up in the air for a year or two whilst people could find their feet. At the end of the day, ignorance prevailed.
Go look up the team selection thing. I did notice the change in stance as well, successive games now rather than the same selection or back 4.
I can guarantee since I've rewatched games since Moyes departure, specifically CL games & few PL games, what you are saying about Mata is wrong, go rewatch some of the games & you'll see.
Again, how do you expect to put your stamp on a team when you only have a short summer window, transfers is basically a managers biggest asset, they make or break teams, how the hell you expect to overhaul in 2 months is beyond me. What was the average age of Evra, Vidic & Ferdinand when Moyes took charge? And stop saying they were the current champions, it means nothing, especially with such a big change, Fergie was at UTD for over 25 years, continuity was never going to happen the very same year. The difference in handling ego's from Everton to UTD is vast and you are completely underselling it.
HE DIDNT NEED TO OVERHAUL!!!!!!! He was handed a team that in their last four seasons had won the league twice and come second by the thinest of margins twice, the expectation level was to just keep the club ticking over in the top 4 and do things gradually. There was no "overhauling" remit so i didn't "expect" him to do it in 2 months because he didn't need to do it at all. You CANNOT dismiss them being the current champions as meaning nothing, of course it does, dont be so completely ridiculous. Yes players had aged but they didn't bloody age in the two months between winning the league in May and him arriving in July!
No on expected continuity. No one expected a flawless change. No on expected titles immediately. What we didn't expect, accept or tolerate was taking a team that like it or not were easily the best team in the league in May 2013 and in the space of months turn them into a side that couldn't beat the likes of Newcastle, Sunderland, West Brom, Southampton, Cardiff and Stoke. We didn't expect the team to become a side that "aspired" to being like Man City, a side that were second favourite playing Liverpool and a side that we "hope to cause problems" for Newcastle United. In the space of a few months thats what we became and those were the words of the manager who seemed to accept the drop in standards as being par for the course.
Yes the difference in handling ego is massive and thats why he was out of his depth and shouldn't have been given the job in the first place. When for years before fans discussed the requirements of a successor to Fergie there was a clear list of desirable qualities that was almost universal.
Experience of title wins
Experience of big players
Experience of big club management
Experience of European success
Experience of big transfers
That isn't unreasonable for a club the size of United and like it or not Moyes didn't tick any of those boxes at all. Now the above isn't guaranteed success by any means (see LVG) but following Fergie you want to minimise the risks and make the massive changes smooth as possible. Handing the job to someone who had never won away to a top 4 team far less win titles was absolutely not going to do that. Yes, he MIGHT work but there is nothing at all to suggest he would. Perhaps if he could communicate his plans in the media, perhaps if his tactics were good, perhaps if the football was entertaining then things could be forgiven but when you put it all together it was a complete disaster and putting him out of his misery was nothing more than a mercy killing.
Well that Lukaku song is certainly something....
Being blown massively out of proportion I think.