Also, parents should not have the right to refuse a proven and widely accepted treatment for a child whose life will be forfeited should treatment not be given unless it has significant effect on the child's quality of life.
So that is no refusal of blood transfusions because of the parent's religion.
No refusal of real medicine because of crap like homeopathy.
I'm pretty sure that happens now anyways.
but with the caveat that I'd like the possibility of opting out to be very visible, and revisited at numerous points, e.g. a question when registering with a GP and then revisited 1 year after the decision is made when contacting your GP (e.g I filled in my registration paperwork 18 months ago including the opt out decision, I contacted the GP today for an appointment and they double checked my details including my willingness to donate).
I don't have a problem with it now but it does open the door to people being bumped off to order. In the future whats to stop them testing all children in the care system and farming them to match the establishment's needs? I have a gut feeling this will be a road paved with good intentions and septic tanks full of dead children.
I don't have a problem with it now but it does open the door to people being bumped off to order. In the future whats to stop them testing all children in the care system and farming them to match the establishment's needs? I have a gut feeling this will be a road paved with good intentions and septic tanks full of dead children.
voted
Disagree but IN
Yet that person could have paid into the system from leaving school at 16. Thankfully your idea won't ever happen.
Well they helped pay for the system that tracks donors and the staff that transplant the organs.What has it got to do with having paid into the system?
Yet that person could have paid into the system from leaving school at 16. Thankfully your idea won't ever happen.
You have got to be some sort of despicable piece of work than rather have your organs used to save a life or more than one life you would rather bury or burn them.
Well they helped pay for the system that tracks donors and the staff that transplant the organs.
Well they helped pay for the system that tracks donors and the staff that transplant the organs.
Not really. You just need to drive your car for a few minutes to see how many unspeakable bell ends there are. Would I wish death on them, no but would I care that they died eventually for whatever reason? No, just like many people dont care that millions of people die every day.
Just when I thought the Daily Fail readership couldn’t get any worse, people are actually commenting that they don’t agree with it as they don’t want their organs going to immigrants. WTAF!
That's a fair point. I hadn't considered that aspect. Kidney.org is quoting £24,100 per year saving for someone after receiving an organ compared to dialysis. http://www.kidney.org.uk/archives/news-archive-2/campaigns-transplantation-trans-cost-effect/An opt out system may even be cheaper considering the number of patients waiting for organs will be minimal and imagine people waiting on a kidney for months on end requiring regular dialysis cost a fair bit.