As expected your post is pretty much a text book example of an argument from ignorance.... I bet you go down a storm with your friends when you liken their jobs to tech support.... Still didn't expect much more given your choice of username and don't think their is anything constructive to be gained from me responding to any further comments you decide to make with regards to this matter.
Phone examination is not a particularly difficult area of forensic examination but it' is still one requiring some knowledge and experience especially in understanding how to interpret the results provided and limitations of the systems used in producing physical and logical downloads from digital devices such as mobile phones.
The difficult part is not necessarily the download part so much as giving evidence about such downloads and the limitations of the hardware and software used. Not quite something to be likened to 'tech support' which typically involves no more than reading a prompt on a screen in front of you whilst selecting pre selected options on a support package. You can't rely on Google or some mates you may or may not have seen doing something vaguely related in an office when you are giving evidence in court.
It is also a potentially time consuming task to both produce and review evidential downloads of certain digital devices as previously outlined.
None of which matters, firstly a user name is a user name, nothing more or less, anyone trying to ascertain the content of someone's character by the username they use is idiotic.
Second, my friends who do the work call it tech support. You're hooking up a cable, downloading data and logging it by and large. This isn't difficult work, it can be time consuming... it can certainly be time consuming to catalogue in meticulous detail 40k messages... but that was never what anyone claimed wasn't true. What was said is, there is a clear time line for the offences and two stories being told. He said she was texting him to initial sex after the supposed rapes occur and she was texting him violent and rape fantasies. Even without this, it's common sense to a 12 yr old to check the texts not from order of the phone being bought, not back to front, but centred around the time the incidents occurred. She's alleging she was raped on several specific dates, not just some time between a point in the past and now and it's guesswork. you keep arguing this point and that you haven't seen the dates mentioned.... but you have no need for this. Again it's utterly common sense, start at the supposed incidents then expand out from there.
If the first 3 days you check are her asking him to come over and bang him again while sharing naughty fantasies with him at the same time bragging with her friends you can pick up the phone, talk the investigating officer and bring up that evidence immediately. YOu're talking about logging this and long times to download, but in reality you can read those texts, immediately see the story is flawed massively and immediately take steps to let those involved know that initial investigation into these texts immediately throws doubt on her story. This can be done within hours, you don't even need to download the data to get to this point, you have the phone to get the data from, you could literally look at the texts from the days in question and in this case would immediately suspect she was lying.
So while I haven't made the arguments you claim, and you keep trying to get around the basic things people are saying to you, you've attacked my character twice in this one post alone based off absolutely nothing and made a false claim that I was making an argument from ignorance.
Again as it appears to me, you were trying to make the software sound more difficult to use than it is, you were trying to make downloading the data sound more difficult than it is and you were trying to imply that your expertise brought deeper insight none of us had..... and the two 'insights' you brought to the table were things we all brought up earlier in the thread. When your trained insight is no different to opinions already mentioned and you're massively over stating how difficult the job is then yes, people won't take your opinion with a lot of weight.
