No, but you are saying "builders" (the strawman) don't get special treatment. Therefore muslims in burkas shouldn't, when no-one is talking about builders other than you.
"A
straw man is a common form of
argument and is an
informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.
[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man.""
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Learn it.
Like I pointed out already I was putting forth my own argument, I was not responding to an opponent's argument/attempting to misrepresent an argument put forth by others. It isn't a straw man. You seemingly don't even understand the definition right in front of you.
I've simply given an example (or rather two) of where someone might make flippant comments with regards to clothing and generate no controversy.
Treating people equally isn't the same as treating everybody the same.
Besides which, again, I don't think anyone is criticising Johnson for expressing his opinion on burkas. It's the way he's expressed it and the language he's used which is wrong.
In this example deliberately moderating your language/criticism for this instance where you wouldn't do so in other instances of criticising clothing wouldn't be treating people equally. It would be pandering to certain people based on their identity - I guess you perhaps subscribe to the bigotry of low expectations.... not too surprising.
I don't see why it is "wrong" to be flippant about clothing when criticising it. And I don't see why someone should be pandered to, treated with kid gloves in a situation like this where you'd be a bit more blunt with regards to others. Especially when the criticism is being made in regards to something particularly oppressive.
the Iranian woman at the world cup spoke volumes in Russia wearing face paint and crop top midriff showing, id wearing headscarf she wouldn't wearing that given a free choice.
^^^ that just about sums it up in plenty of cases tbh...
Why isn't MeToo going in to nuclear meltdown about Muslim women being forced in to a dress code by men? I don't see any criticism from those lot at all...
same issue as usual, people on the left are prone to ignoring various messed up issues relating to Islam
you get occasionally amusing incidents like a UK ex-muslim group quite rightly wanting to march in gay pride events and a London mosque wanting to have them banned... these are people who've been suppressed by a religion, by their community and are therefore marching for the very reasons pride events started and their signs are of course often critical of Islam or contain things like "Allah is a gay god" - the sort of thing that would generate screeches of "racism" or threats of arrest by the police for breach of the peace in other circumstances... but because it is pride and they're just doing what gay rights campaigners have done for decades with regards to mainstream culture in the UK and Christianity then it is an amusing conundrum that the organisers have... do they allow the "Islamophobia" that we get repeatedly told these days is "racism" or do they allow a bunch of oppressed gay ex-muslim people to carry on marching and protesting in exactly the same way as gay people who have been brought up in Christian households have done in the past.
Do people on here go through life constantly raging at everything all day long.
apparently so, all Boris did was criticise some clothing choice but instead we get screeches of racism etc.. in another context, when criticising clothing, no one would care