Things took an unpleasant and frankly unnecessary turn a few months after Edie's death though to he honest the signs were there almost from the death itself and that was the behaviour of her son Steven, a banker though as it turns out changing the first letter would be more applicable.
Anyway he decided that his mother's small estate around £26,000 should go to his sons, because he stated in an email that this was what his mother woukd have wanted my 37 years of being her partner were to be ignored. I questioned how he could possibly know what his mother wanted seeing as she was fortunate to see him 5/6 times a year even though he lives and works in the same city as his mother. He decided that curtailing any further communication with me was the way forward.
I decided that using section 29 of the Families Act Scotland 2006 was the way to go and engaged a lawyer to take the natter forward. Long story short, Steven met with my lawyer yesterday and made the expected offer of £2000, after my lawyer informed him that under the act I was entitled to half after after much haggling the sum of £11000 was offered which no accepted after cost I will receive a little over £ 10,000.
This sort of action should not have bern necessary, the fault in the first instance lies with Edie and myself for not getting married even if all that meant was a couple of neighbours and a registry office, then of course we have the unpleasantness of Steven, we have never got on for many reasons so I suppose his behaviour was not really unexpected, shame though.
So you older unmarried folk think very hard about what could happen if one of you die and you do not have your affairs in order, you really do not need this sort of **** in an already unpleasant time in your life.