Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 11,440
- Location
- Crowmarsh
Jurassic World of awful writing 2. The first is passable even though they try to turn a horrendously incompetent awful woman into a protagonist and try to have us sympathise with her, but there are some okay bits and it's definitely watchable if not a great film.
The second film is dire even by the standards of the first film, if the stupidity of the decisions being made in the first film made you angry the second film might send you on a murder rampage through Hollywood. Nothing anyone does at any point makes the slightest bit of sense. The pacing is horrendous. The end of what you might consider Act 1 would normally be the end of the film and the end of the film is a giant and ridiculous let down. It's like they spent 80% of the budget and had to rewrite the rest of it to take place in a basically a single small area to save cash and wrote a terrible story to fit.
2-3/10. A complete and utter joke of a film. The actual dinosaur part of the story was weak, at one point I thought they were just using dinosaurs as a back drop for the latest disaster/apocalypse type film before act 1 ended.
Oh dear, that good eh?
They really should have left Jurassic park alone after the first one. All of the sequels have been pretty poor if you ask me.
The old cash cow must be milked though....