Radical Feminist and SJW's incessant cultural Marxism could create havoc on internet infastructure.

Burnsy2023 said:
There's no hypocrisy. Like I said in my blindness analogy, I can't, however noble my intentions, know what it's like to live being blind and the barriers that are in place that other's would not understand or even notice. That's not my fault, but it is reality.
Click to expand...


You are saying I will never be subject to discrimination because of my gender or skin colour is literally discriminating against me because of my skin colour and gender. You are pre judging me as never have or going to experience discrimination or prejudice because of my skin colour and gender. Please look up the definition of hypocrisy.
 
Mason- said:
You are saying I will never be subject to discrimination because of my gender or skin colour is literally discriminating against me because of my skin colour and gender. You are pre judging me as never have or going to experience discrimination or prejudice. Please look up the definition of hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

That's not what I'm saying, but clearly any subtly will be missed.

Hades said:
Still havent seen the plethora examples of hostile environment.
Click to expand...

I know. The time I would need to articulate the issues would be wasted. It's not going to change your mind.

I was going to respond to more comments, but my time is wasted here. This issue didn't come out of nowhere. There is good evidence to show that the issues are getting better but still exist. Clearly there is another demographic who don't see the issue or understand it and therefore it doesn't exist. I've gone past the point where I'll argue with people on the internet who are never going to want to understand the other point of view.
 
Burnsy2023 said:
I was going to respond to more comments, but my time is wasted here. This issue didn't come out of nowhere. There is good evidence to show that the issues are getting better but still exist. Clearly there is another demographic who don't see the issue or understand it and therefore it doesn't exist. I've gone past the point where I'll argue with people on the internet who are never going to want to understand the other point of view.
Click to expand...

Poor.
 
Imagine reading and replying and partaking in a discussion on a forum for 2 hours, and then saying you don't care enough or have lots of time to argue.

Truly baffling. :confused:

So to summarise, he's made a strident claim, provided no evidence, said white males will never be subject to discrimination (and in doing so discriminating against them) over the span of 2 hours and now simply just doesn't care enough.

Great. Good stuff.

Have you considered you might be wrong?
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
The worst thing about Radical Feminists and SJW's is their excuses for Social Marxism, those excuses invariably being because whatever industry or ilk we target hates Woman and Minorities.
Click to expand...

That ^^^^ lays a false Misogyny and Racism charge at white males, so i would argue with the rise of SJW' and Radical Feminism culture white males are increasingly becoming the target of discrimination.
 
We need to stop referring to "master" and "slave" as no other groups of humans aside from black people were ever enslaved in the history of the world so it must be a dig at them right?

If we do this then suddenly many black developers will emerge from the ether and start contributing to open source projects that were already completely open for them to contribute to.

Likewise female and LGBTQ developers will appear too as we tackle more micro aggressions.
 
Frankly when it comes to coding and in the situations where I have to subcontract I dont care if the people I hire are black, white, shades of brown, identify as a toaster, or were born with 3 reproductive organs.

I just want the best code for the job, and whoevers code is best for the job gets used.

That is how it SHOULD be, im not going to start including inferior code just to keep the SJWs happy.
 
Like all Socialism Social equality also involves taking something from someone who is talented and worked hard to get where they are to give to someone who isn't and didn't, because equality is more important than reality.
 
My team who are about 10 meters away from me

My two boss's

Digital Delivery Manager - Hindu of South Indian heritage late 30s
Back End Test Manager - 50 year old mad as a bag of cats Kiwi Lady

My Team -
1 senior test analyst - Nice Nigerian chap in his 40s
1 senior test analyst - Nice gay Nigerian chap also in his 40s
1 Business test Analyst - Nice Nigerian chap in her 40s
1 senior test analyst - South indian chap early 30s doing a great job and even better at cricket

So issue in E-commences development here. They where all hired as they where the best candidates

The Games industry was white male and pasty but from all over the work, that changed over the 10 years I was there due to more women applying for roles naturally
 
humbug said:
Like all Socialism Social equality also involves taking something from someone who is talented and worked hard to get where they are to give to someone who isn't and didn't, because equality is more important than reality.
Click to expand...
Or simply giving them a chance to at least get to the interview stage...

There have bee massive numbers of studies and research that shows if you give someone a list of resume's without any names or other personal information you'll get X result, if you give them the same resume's with personal information you'll get a massively different result (frequently with those resumes that suggest the person isn't a white male doing much worse than in the blind test.

That's just getting invited to the job interview, let alone getting the job, or how you're treated once you're in the job.

Brunsy's example of how you don't realise what problems someone may face when you're not in that group if quite a good one.
You just have to look at some of the threads and posts on this forum when it comes to disabilities and people showing how ignorant they are when they can't grasp why you can't just have one car for every disability type, or why it's a really good idea to design and build things that are meant to last decades with the disabled in mind (for example why it's a really good idea to build houses with doors that are wide enough for wheelchairs and don't have a high step).

There are fairly serious issues in the IT industry (or at least parts of it) with how women who enter it have been treated and it does put people off entering it when they see how others have been treated badly, which shows you going on about giving jobs to the less skilled is bunk, as you don't know how many excellent people have been forced out at an early stage by the behaviour and attitudes of idiots, or simply decided they didn't want to face that (having seen it or heard how people they admire got dealt with), and decided to do something that they weren't as good at but could do without the harassment and idiocy.
 
Last edited:
interesting thinking but i would say coding is one field that women and minorities have an equal playing field.

if i'm employing someone to put a new website together for me i couldnt care less if their black white blue have meat and 2 veg or not.

if their work is good then its good
 
I read about this earlier this week. I'm surprised that people are able to simply revoke their own code, especially when other code is resting on its existence. I'd have thought that once it was submitted you give up control of it. I know nothing about the legal ins and outs of software development though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom