I take it the link @Meaker posted has explained it clearly enough for you or do you have another edgy comeback?
76 trans children at one school
- Thread starter G-MAN2004
- Start date
I take it the link @Meaker posted has explained it clearly enough for you or do you have another edgy comeback?
Edgy? How is pointing out that “transphobia” as you were using the term isn’t necessarily a hate crime edgy?
Are you going to back up your claim?
Dowie, you truly are the gift that keeps on giving.
Why not answer the question? You made a claim, it’s not unreasonable to ask for that claim to either be clarified or justified and so far you’ve dodged any follow up. Another poster has joined in the discussion part way through and provided a link that doesn't really address the issue:
This is the claim:
"transphobia" isn't in itself a crime, especially if you're using it to refer to posters on OCUK - if you think otherwise then why not clarify what you're referring to and explain why it is a crime? By referring to "keyboard transphobes" on OCUK you imply that there is some transphobia here, which you claim is a hate crime - care to highlight which posts constitute a hate crime or would be if the opinions in them were aired "in the real world"?
Yeah this is why this "phobia" word is pure nonsense. If you use the same logic it would assume that when a woman is repulsed by a man's advances it is "heterophobia" lmao.
Therefore it is obvious that these buzzwords exist only to give extra special protection in order to assist the propagation of trans sex mind control propaganda.
How can you stop someone being scared of mutilated genitals?
If you can't join the dots then I'm afraid nothing I or anyone else says will help you understand. I'd rather not waste my time, cheers.
It was a simple request for you to clarify/back up a vague claim you chose to make, seemingly you can't.
Joining the dots as you put it we can see your claim is false, transphobia in a general sense isn't necessarily a crime, you're incorrect to claim that, especially when referring to "transphobes" posting on here.
Right-o.
Serious question - why keep replying if you're unwilling or unable to engage in discussion or back up your claims? You made a deliberately provocative post and then when called out on it you just reply with facile responses and avoid having to justify your post. It isn't particularly constructive.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2017
- Posts
- 969
- Location
- scotland
I got a warning on another message board for inferring that trans-women weren't real women.
[ which is patently obvious ].
Another indication that the liberal elite are slowly succeeding in eroding free speech.
We must stand up to fascism.
[ which is patently obvious ].
Another indication that the liberal elite are slowly succeeding in eroding free speech.
We must stand up to fascism.
Mate, take the hint, yea? There's really no need for any more wordy replies.
Still dodging, yet still replying... I guess that just about sums it up, the provocative post had no real basis to it.
Right-o.
By today's ****** up society my 2 year old must have to identify as a T-Rex as its what he pretends to be and says.
I worry for my sons future with what happens these days, by time he is in school likely have some ****** up non gender toilet ********.
I worry for my sons future with what happens these days, by time he is in school likely have some ****** up non gender toilet ********.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 2,021
- Location
- London
Like the one you use at home?
Do you have cubicles at home?
The toilet in peoples houses is more akin to a public disabled toilet.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 2,021
- Location
- London
If non gender toilets are suitable for disabled people then why not everyone else? Or is it just easier to discriminate against the disabled?
Is the problem of which toilet a disabled transgender person uses a non issue?