Soldato
Which is a fair bit more percentage-wise than the utilisation they get
lol
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Which is a fair bit more percentage-wise than the utilisation they get
980ti to 1080ti performance increase of around 70% at 1440p for an increase of $50 = not a fail
1080ti to 2080ti performance increase of around 30% at 1440p for an increase of $400 = FAIL
Actually you will find that those cheap (sub £1200) RTX2080Tis are not the same as the £1400+ RTX2080Tis.
The latter are more power efficient and clock better as the SKU is different.
Actually you will find that those cheap (sub £1200) RTX2080Tis are not the same as the £1400+ RTX2080Tis.
The latter are more power efficient and clock better as the SKU is different.
Actually you will find that those cheap (sub £1200)
But if you add another 20-45% on when games all in the future support DLSS you're back to a comparable increase in performance (70%). Raw performance isn't there but something had to give to bring RTX to the table .980ti to 1080ti performance increase of around 70% at 1440p for an increase of $50 = not a fail
1080ti to 2080ti performance increase of around 30% at 1440p for an increase of $400 = FAIL
Is that really the case though?FE 2080 Ti clocks as well as the best and costs £1099
Add waterblock and it is even better
Is that really the case though?
I think a while back someone post something on this forum about that despite the Nvidia GPUs being the "same spec", Nvidia have separate the GPUs in the tier A parts and tier B with different part IDs/model numbers, with the teir A parts that can clock better being allocated to the more premium cards (such as AIB factory overclocked models), while the teir B parts that cannot clock as high are allocated to the lower price budget models (i.e. the blower cooler cards such as "Joker card").
Not really sure if there's any true to this.
Is ray-tracing still coming to Tomb Raider?
But if you add another 20-45% on when games all in the future support DLSS .
But if you add another 20-45% on when games all in the future support DLSS you're back to a comparable increase in performance (70%). Raw performance isn't there but something had to give to bring RTX to the table .
Hopefully next gen takes a good step forward and I think it's going to come a little sooner than normal time between generations.
I know, remains to be seen .if nv can get it in top releases that will be nice.LOL
Key word there is "when" but should probably be an "if".
I am very unimpressed with NVidia on this, if they are going to use RTX in TR as a demo for the launch the least they can do is make sure it is included in the game after all this time.
NVidia must be getting very close to being guilty of false advertising with the RTX launch because of the lack of RTX in TR.
I recall someone did a direct comparison between natively rendered 3200x1800 res vs 4K DLSS, and concluded with that image quality and performance between pretty much comparable, with the latter limited to games that developers willing to support the feature, whereas the former have no such limitation.But DLSS is reliant on Nvidia and the developers to implement. So it will never replace true physical performance improvement.
The 70% increase between 980ti and 1080ti was across all games without the need for developers or Nvidia to make it work
It just won't happen this time around and to add insult to injury they are charging a $400 premium for it
Price was a fail