• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

beany_bot said:
Any idea what more info will we get at E3?
More CPU's? The 16 core? More gamaing benches? Mobo prices? Pre-orders?
Click to expand...

I think it will be more about the architecture such as the latest version of XFR, PBO, All core boosts, overclocking etc.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
well atleast the pubg benchmark looked pretty good. close to 8700k ipc results. indicates very close to intel gaming potential. now its just down to pricing and temps. hopefully you dont need to find unicorn memory to make them work correctly like ryzens first launch.
Click to expand...
Lol you are such a troll. You choose your words so carefully to maximise your troll without getting banned.

"indicates very close to intel gaming potential"

Lisa said "match or BEAT" Intel in gaming performance. And from what we are seeing about potential overclocks, mem speeds and latency, we can all see Zen2 is going to comfortably beat Intel. Everyone can see this and you continue to troll.
 
beany_bot said:
I very much doubt it will be technical. It's a gaming conference.
Click to expand...

I believe some of the tech press asked about XFR, PBO etc and was told by AMD to wait and see what happens at E3, so while I doubt it will be really in depth, we might get some more specifics about frequencies with XFR etc.
 
AMD will benchmark the 3900X at E3 showing it ahead of the 9900k in Battlefield V.

This forum will blow up because AMD cherry picked a game that scales well with SMT then we'll have another month of pointless arguments.

:D
 
beany_bot said:
Lol you are such a troll. You choose your words so carefully to maximise your troll without getting banned.

"indicates very close to intel gaming potential"

Lisa said "match or BEAT" Intel in gaming performance. And from what we are seeing about potential overclocks, mem speeds and latency, we can all see Zen2 is going to comfortably beat Intel. Everyone can see this and you continue to troll.
Click to expand...

we had a pubg benchmark lol. it showed in the event pubg performance same as a 8700 not overclocked. with the new amd zen chips. so no troll it is correct. nearly as fast as a 8700k in games which is actually really good because they were behind about 15 percent in pubg. so it shows a great improvement.

" matched or beat " depends on how they want to position the goal posts. like every benchmark. at pubg literally even is impressive.
 
beany_bot said:
Lol you are such a troll. You choose your words so carefully to maximise your troll without getting banned.

"indicates very close to intel gaming potential"

Lisa said "match or BEAT" Intel in gaming performance. And from what we are seeing about potential overclocks, mem speeds and latency, we can all see Zen2 is going to comfortably beat Intel. Everyone can see this and you continue to troll.
Click to expand...

Don't forget Intel can OC as well....
 
beany_bot said:
Do you see what you've done there?
Click to expand...

what ? they benchmarked a new amd zen chip in pubg vs a stock 8700 non k chip and it was slightly ahead. there is already pubg benchmarks for 8700ks and ocd they are faster. so 8700k performance in pubg is good. as previously they were about 15 percent behind . which is a good leap.

also why wouldnt they bench against a 8700k version or a 9700k or 9900k ? its obvious because they are slower in pubg. you dont show your new product to be slower. that makes it inferior. so they used a cpu they could literally match or beat.
 
Would be hilarious if the boost clocks published were all core sustained and not including PBO/XFR when there is power/thermal to spare :p

Not saying anything of the sort but fun to speculate
 
~>Dg<~ said:
also why wouldnt they bench against a 8700k version or a 9700k or 9900k ? its obvious because they are slower in pubg. you dont show your new product to be slower. that makes it inferior. so they used a cpu they could literally match or beat.
Click to expand...

It was a user on Chiphell who benchmarked the 3600 (non X) against the 8700.

On stage AMD showed the 3900X against the 9900k.

Just for clarification.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
what ? they benchmarked a new amd zen chip in pubg vs a stock 8700 non k chip and it was slightly ahead. there is already pubg benchmarks for 8700ks and ocd they are faster. so 8700k performance in pubg is good. as previously they were about 15 percent behind . which is a good leap.

also why wouldnt they bench against a 8700k version or a 9700k or 9900k ? its obvious because they are slower in pubg. you dont show your new product to be slower. that makes it inferior. so they used a cpu they could literally match or beat.
Click to expand...
They showed PUBG and your claiming Zen2 is slower in "GAMES" PLURAL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom