AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - * NO COMPETITOR HINTING *

Potatowithearsontheside · 31 May 2019 at 15:25

So we're agreed...? You add an S to something and its already the second coming of the messiah.

(not talking about the 9900KS here, just the addition of the letter 's' in a dg post).

beany_bot · 31 May 2019 at 15:28

Potatowithearsontheside said:
So we're agreed...? You add an S to something and its already the second coming of the messiah.

(not talking about the 9900KS here, just the addition of the letter 's' in a dg post).

Im just saying. We saw a PUBG benchy.
DG is already twisting it to saying intel is faster in games. plural. i.e. across the board.

~>Dg<~ · 31 May 2019 at 15:29

generally because the strongest cpu in pubg is the fastest gaming cpu. it showed amd 15 percent behind with previous ryzen cpus and guess what performance leap they got with the new cpus ? 15 percent. oh and guess what they are about level with a 8700 in pubg. you see now ?

Scougar · 31 May 2019 at 15:33

~>Dg<~ said:
generally because the strongest cpu in pubg is the fastest gaming cpu. it showed amd 15 percent behind with previous ryzen cpus and guess what performance leap they got with the new cpus ? 15 percent. oh and guess what they are about level with a 8700 in pubg. you see now ?

Please clarify, which cpu are you referring to as "the fastest gaming cpu in pubg" ?

Kashinoda · 31 May 2019 at 15:35

~>Dg<~ said:
generally because the strongest cpu in pubg is the fastest gaming cpu. it showed amd 15 percent behind with previous ryzen cpus and guess what performance leap they got with the new cpus ? 15 percent. oh and guess what they are about level with a 8700 in pubg. you see now ?

The benchmark spoken about came from Chiphell, it was:

AMD 3600 3600 @ 183 FPS
vs
Intel 8700 @ 177 FPS

So it's literally the lowest Ryzen 3 announced. https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2001351-1-1.html

AMD demoed the 9900k vs 3900X on stage.

Thekwango · 31 May 2019 at 15:39

beany_bot said:
Means nothing. How many people play fortnite and subscribe to Logan Paul? Numbers do not maketh good.

it's still a perfectly good game. i tried fortnite and it wasn't my type of game. however i'm not silly enough to then simply deride it as being a bad game. when you have the numbers of players both these games have they must be doing something right.

had to google Logan Paul (never trust anyone with a surname as a forename btw) apples and oranges comparison. he's a youtuber, there's no need for interaction with him. you have to interact with a game, if it's inherently crap it won't generate a massive player base or rather it may generate a huge player base from hype but it won't maintain it.

Potatowithearsontheside · 31 May 2019 at 15:42

If we're seeing a trend of high refresh rate gaming at low resolutions, how long is it before the monitor becomes the bottleneck?

KentMan · 31 May 2019 at 15:42

Kashinoda said:
The benchmark spoken about came from Chiphell, it was:

AMD 3600 3600 @ 183 FPS
vs
Intel 8700 @ 177 FPS

So it's literally the lowest Ryzen 3 announced. https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2001351-1-1.html

AMD demoed the 9900k vs 3900X on stage.

Waiting for DGs pro Intel spin on this, dis gun be gud!! As they say

Potatowithearsontheside · 31 May 2019 at 15:44

8700 is a higher number than 3600 therefore AMD is slower.

^^my prediction of dg's response^^

Kashinoda · 31 May 2019 at 15:45

KentMan said:
Waiting for DGs pro Intel spin on this, dis gun be gud!! As they say

"We can't trust some random user on Chiphell, wait for reviews"

Despite using that very same benchmark incorrectly for 10 pages.

KentMan · 31 May 2019 at 15:45

Ironically the 12 core which is 2 ccx matched the 9900k.. the 3600 beat an 8700, so uhh something tells me the single CCX chips are going to be marginally faster than the dual CCX chips.

The fact the 9900k was matched and or bettered by the 3900x makes me think the 3800x and Lisa's reference to it being "the one gamers are going to want" makes me think the 3800x is going to be the defacto king of gaming CPUs shortly

Scougar · 31 May 2019 at 15:55

KentMan said:
Ironically the 12 core which is 2 ccx matched the 9900k.. the 3600 beat an 8700, so uhh something tells me the single CCX chips are going to be marginally faster than the dual CCX chips.

The fact the 9900k was matched and or bettered by the 3900x makes me think the 3800x and Lisa's reference to it being "the one gamers are going to want" makes me think the 3800x is going to be the defacto king of gaming CPUs shortly

If there is a big difference between single chiplet vs multiple, the I will have to think very carefully about which to go for. I render videos a little bit, so having the extra cores will definitely be of benefit.

TrixX · 31 May 2019 at 15:59

KentMan said:
Waiting for DGs pro Intel spin on this, dis gun be gud!! As they say

Watch him start rocking in the corner instead, repeatedly saying 'Intel is the best for gaming, Intel is the best for gaming...'

Zeed · 31 May 2019 at 16:09

Scougar said:
If there is a big difference between single chiplet vs multiple, the I will have to think very carefully about which to go for. I render videos a little bit, so having the extra cores will definitely be of benefit.

I'm ordering 12 core if I'm not happy with overclocks on it goes back and getting 8 core instead.

ben90 · 31 May 2019 at 16:09

Scougar said:
If there is a big difference between single chiplet vs multiple, the I will have to think very carefully about which to go for. I render videos a little bit, so having the extra cores will definitely be of benefit.

You need to buy the 12 core chip repeatedly until you win the silicone lottery and hit the magical 5ghz on all cores so you get the best of both worlds!

spoffle · 31 May 2019 at 16:22

beany_bot said:
Means nothing. How many people play fortnite and subscribe to Logan Paul? Numbers do not maketh good.

"I don't like" isn't the same as "bad" though. You might dislike Fortnite, and that's fine, but that doesn't make it bad.

There are objective reasons why Logan Paul is bad.

spoffle · 31 May 2019 at 16:24

KentMan said:
Ironically the 12 core which is 2 ccx matched the 9900k.. the 3600 beat an 8700, so uhh something tells me the single CCX chips are going to be marginally faster than the dual CCX chips.

The fact the 9900k was matched and or bettered by the 3900x makes me think the 3800x and Lisa's reference to it being "the one gamers are going to want" makes me think the 3800x is going to be the defacto king of gaming CPUs shortly

How is that ironic?

d_brennen · 31 May 2019 at 16:29

spoffle said:
How is that ironic?

It's like ironic rain on your wedding day

beany_bot · 31 May 2019 at 16:29

d_brennen said:
It's like ironic rain on your wedding day

A free ride, when you've already paid?

beany_bot · 31 May 2019 at 16:30

Zeed said:
I'm ordering 12 core if I'm not happy with overclocks on it goes back and getting 8 core instead.

Thanks for helping put up the price of products.

Competitor rules

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - * NO COMPETITOR HINTING *