They also showed single thread benchmark results at that clock. That of itself is particularly misleading.
No doubt, they're a retailer trying to ship these I guess.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
They also showed single thread benchmark results at that clock. That of itself is particularly misleading.
I honestly wouldn't trust the accuracy of Day 1 reviews. There simply won't have been enough time to tinker with, and properly understand full functionality. I suspect that there'll still be some performance under the hood that can be extracted by someone will to take a deep dive.Give us some juicy reviews now!!![]()
Resisted the upgrade bug for the 9xxx series Intel chips, not sure I'll manage it here.
Shout out to my 4790k though, maybe I remember wrong but I can't remember ever having such an easy decision of what to upgrade to.
Snap! Mine's been through multiple cases, delidded to get the temps down etc
As far as gaming went, people called me mad for spending £250 on a CPU! "Who needs all those threads?" "for gaming, an i5 is all you'll ever need"
How times change eh
If we see parity today. You can be absolutely certain that ryzen will beat intel in ~6 months+.
4.7ghz is boost clock on 8700k
i bet people do run the very hot 8700k at 4.3ghz bad itx cases and low profile cpu coolers and full builds with bad coolers cant tame the 8700k beast at 4.7ghz![]()
I honestly wouldn't trust the accuracy of Day 1 reviews. There simply won't have been enough time to tinker with, and properly understand full functionality. I suspect that there'll still be some performance under the hood that can be extracted by someone will to take a deep dive.
That being said, I'm still expecting parity across a wide variety of games. It'll be interesting to pinpoint just what the bottlenecks are in some games that show a notable deficit or lead, and there are bound to be a few of each. For instance, we already know that in CS:GO it is the L3 cache rather than anything else that is most important for performance.
There will be very little if any memory testing, overclock testing etc
Tomorrow we get to find out why the 3800x even exists!
Snap! Mine's been through multiple cases, delidded to get the temps down etc
As far as gaming went, people called me mad for spending £250 on a CPU! "Who needs all those threads?" "for gaming, an i5 is all you'll ever need"
How times change eh
What I found interesting about the gaming video sections was the disparity between RAM usage for various games. In some cases the 8700K was hitting 33% higher RAM, whilst not necessarily showing significantly reduced framerates.
Will also be interesting to see if anyone dares to review against fully secured Intel chips, with all their security patches and fixes etc.
The big game changer there is the word "dares". When i start to read the reviews latter today, unless a reviewer specifically says they are running a fully patched Intel system and comparing it against a Ryzen system running 1903, then that reviewers results are worthless.
I suspect most won't "dare", because they know full well the wrath of an angry Intel will drop on them like a ton of bricks.
If we see parity today. You can be absolutely certain that ryzen will beat intel in ~6 months+.
Will also be interesting to see if anyone dares to review against fully secured Intel chips, with all their security patches and fixes etc.
That 3600 review with rubbish ram was already looking good, can't wait to see proper reviews with x570 and all the boost enhancements on the higher end chips