Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yeah except all the reviews compare both CPUs at stock in games and we already know that Zen 2 has 0 benefits when overclocked. The difference will be higher when 9900K is overclocked.
For me Intel need to ..... not suffer anymore security vulnerabilities.
Jumped on the Taichi bandwagon. Over £100 less than I expected to pay - means I can maybe go 3900x over 3800xdespite only needing it for gaming .... can't help myself!
I think that is like expecting Boeing to make safe planes, currently. I.E. Not going to happen.
The 9900k, for gaming it's the no-brainer.
So you don't think day1 immature bios can't have any impact on these chips? And what were seeing today is defacto final performance we will see for their entire lifetime?
Ridicules how close the 3700x at 65w gets to the 9900k at much higher power.
Is that from that place located close to one of big Sam's former employers?
yes 3700x looks good and powerful and frugal if left at stock. https://www.bit-tech.net/reviews/tech/cpus/amd-ryzen-7-3700x-review/7/Ridicules how close the 3700x at 65w gets to the 9900k at much higher power.
Is it really that difficult to test the systems with as close as possible RAM speeds and timings?
So you don't think day1 immature bios can't have any impact on these chips? And what were seeing today is defacto final performance we will see for their entire lifetime?
Oh yea, sorry my mistakeNeither of those prices are correct.