Except it was £329 on release not £200. Stop talking rubbish.
You get 20% uplift at same release price. Otherwise you might as well say you get a 2 to 10% increase (depending on workload) for the i9 9900k Vs i7 8700k for £160 difference now.
AMD released the CPU series at pretty much the same release price each gen whilst just adding more to stack and you just ignore that every post you do.
You can view it many ways.
Prior to Zen 2 being released I saw the 2700 going for ~£155 at a few places.
People looking to buy Intel at that point weren't comparing Intel current pricing with AMD's release prices but the prices available AT THE TIME YOU BUY which is the only real numbers that matters.
That comparison was as valid then as it is now; post Zen 2 release.
If it isn't valid now then it wasn't then which makes a mockery of the whole pricing issue.
You can't have it just one way unless you have an agenda or are a bit simple.
I don't have a problem at all with AMD reducing prices but it does have a downside as it means the current generation can look very poor value compared to the previous.
AMD aren't just competing against Intel but also themselves.
Many of you living on a cloud of 'must have the latest, regardless of value' are often oblivious to the fact that to the vast majority PCs are tools like a Ford Fiesta, so value trumps MPH or 0-62 figures.