Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because Trump blocked them and they didnt want to spend years in court.

Evidence please?

Only one was subpoenaed and and rejected and the house failed to go any further. what about the others.

Still waiting for an answer to...

Why didn't the house do the right thing and compel them all to testify under oath then???
 
I'm asking you whether that was ok or not? was it?

Why is it ok for Obama to investigate/spy on Trump when he was running for president?

There was literally an IG report that came out less than 2 months ago that blew that CT out of the water. Did you miss that? No wire taps and they didn't try in place any undercover agents in Trump campaign.
 
Defeated by the truth and facts.

You have none of these. All you have is debunked conspiracy theories.

You and Trusty have not posted a single shred of evidence that

A. Biden specifically blocked aid to stop an investigation into his son
B. Obama directed people to spy on the Trump campaign for his own political/personal benefit.

Both are utterly debunked conspiracy theories.
 
I just answered that question in the post you are quoting :confused:

"Because of blatant and rampant obstruction that would have dragged the whole thing out for months, if not years."

You were already debunked on that. Your failure to grasp the concept of the US system of separation of powers is so sad.

Executive privilege (as used by many presidents) does not equal rampant obstruction.

so answer the question at hand as to why the house did not call all the witnesses they wanted?

I know the answer and i really think you do too but you just cannot bring yourself to honestly say it.
 
You were already debunked on that. Your failure to grasp the concept of the US system of separation of powers is so sad.

Executive privilege (as used by many presidents) does not equal rampant obstruction.

so answer the question at hand as to why the house did not call all the witnesses they wanted?

I know the answer and i really think you do too but you just cannot bring yourself to honestly say it.


?

You are stuck in a loop, so here it is again:

"Because of blatant and rampant obstruction that would have dragged the whole thing out for months, if not years."

They are quite clear that they want the senates power and help to subpeona all those involved so as to get them to testify in the impeachment trial.

Bolton has now said he would answer a senate subpeona. So why not get him in?
 

That is a lot of opinions (some very old and already out of date/debunked).

Still not one single piece of factual evidence that Obama ordered people to spy on the Trump campaign for personal/political benefit.

I am still happy for you to copy a passage that is actual evidence of this. You must know of many such passages or paragraphs that you have read this prove this accusation of yours.
 
That is a lot of opinions (some very old and already out of date/debunked).

Still not one single piece of factual evidence that Obama ordered people to spy on the Trump campaign for personal/political benefit.

I am still happy for you to copy a passage that is actual evidence of this. You must know of many such passages or paragraphs that you have read this prove this accusation of yours.

Why were they spying? So its ok to spy, just not for political benefit?

So if Trump spied on the Biden campaign, that would be fine yea?

Which article is debunked?
 
They may get that option.

Why didn't the house do the right thing and compel them all to testify under oath then???

For the very simple reason that it can take months for it to work its way through the courts. Trump would have taken it all the way to the Supreme Court and it would have been smack in the middle of the 2020 election by that time. It's the same reason they didn't go to court over the documents they requested. There is an argument they should have gone to the lowest court, won that case and then not wasted any more time on it. They decided not to bother.
 
Why were they spying? So its ok to spy, just not for political benefit?

So if Trump spied on the Biden campaign, that would be fine yea?

Which article is debunked?

Well, even if spying did occur by law enforcement, it could be valid for a number of reasons.

That is before we even get into Obama actually ordering it himself!
 
All that says is he disagrees with some of it. Where does he say and show proof Obama ordered spying? Where is his report? And why do you believe Durham over the DoJ's IG? Specifically what proof is there that the IG is wrong and Durham is correct?

Your original claim was based on just Barr saying he thinks there was spying. A man who was caught misrepresenting another significant report.

Trump claimed there were millions of fraudulent votes in 2016. That was false. He said Obama spied on him. And that was also false, pending Durham's evidence which I'd wager will never surface or is extremely weak. Trump implied Obama wasn't born in America. That was false.

Seeing a pattern?
 
Last edited:

Oh you mean that investigation that is still open. His comments that were unprecedented because prosecutors are never meant to comment on open investigations. He has still shown zero evidence to support his comments. Until he does then perhaps it would be sensible to go with the IG report huh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom