Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good News
DHS was immediately suspending enrollment in Global Entry and several other Trusted Traveler Programs (TTP) for all New York state residents -- a dramatic move in response to the liberal state's recently enacted sanctuary "Green Light Law."

"New York law prohibited state DMVs from sharing criminal records with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)."

Well done Trump.
Time to protect people.
 
:confused:

Have i got to explain presidential term limits to you now?


People on the hill are saying
"“failed” impeachment “nullifies” the president’s first term, making him eligible for not just one, but two more — three terms altogether!"
 
People on the hill are saying
"“failed” impeachment “nullifies” the president’s first term, making him eligible for not just one, but two more — three terms altogether!"

Those "people on the hill" are incorrect.
 
speaker pelosi is being charged with destroying a state document and other things.

Which was proven on TV.

Bernie is doing very well.....hard luck clinton
 
A. Obama inherited a massive global recession
It was a recession yes, but it was one created by lax regulation and the willful complicit banks in order to get a bail out from the FED. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robert...-2008-financial-collapse-was-worse-than-1929/

Some of the banks that were bailed out had a liquidity of 3%, or they were leveraged over 30 times. So if 4% of their loans went bad, which was happening with sub-prime(way more), they were bankrupt!

Remember they were threatening to tank the economy if they didn't get the 'liquidity'. That's they prices went up worldwide because the $ is the worlds reserve currency.

They should have gone the Iceland route and let them all fail, Iceland is doing well now without those zombie banks - plus it send a signal that irresponsible lending won't be helped out.


B. "Trump vowed to erase the debt during his presidency, but instead has only added to it with the GOP tax cuts and short-term spending bills."
A dept that took over 200 years to create, that was obviously a bullcrap pledge.
 
What is it, 4? 5? days now I've been asking for this magical evidence of which you speak, were is it? At least I put in some effort to prove my points, you don't even do that.

Just google the amount of people who have been indicted and locked up under the current corrupt regime. Its there in black and white.

Also you may choose to dismiss evidence due to being extremely biased but you cant refute it. Its the reason you are tarred with being a CT nutter.
 
The whole US system is broken. Great idea but the founders never thought it would end up like this with politics this partisan. They don't even have a federal right to vote, its all down to the States which is why some of them purge voters rolls to stop people voting if they are likely to vote for the opposite party. Can you imagine Washington, Madison, Jefferson would be cool with that? In the UK you can just turn up and vote, we have a legal right to do so. In the US you don't. And now other nations have been given free rein to attack and manipulate their elections, how is that going to end well? The GOP have been so short sighted. They should have slammed Russia with sanctions so harsh no nation would **** with their elections again. Instead they didn't even get a smack on the wrist. Good luck America, you're screwed.

Hmm maybe the words "this partisan" was a clue. Of course they warned against it, where did I say they didn't? Yet there is an argument that it is even more partisan than in the era of the civil war and only getting worse. I actually mentioned their names in regards to how people are being disenfranchised in their thousands for partisan political purposes. If your right to vote is removed because you might vote for the other party then your democracy is broken. Or is that ok with you?

You do spew some diarrhoea yourself. Maybe try actually reading a post next time rather than just jumping on a couple of worlds that you interpret one way ;)
And yet they did because they very specifically warned against it and what damage it could do. The rest is a bunch of hyperbolic nonsense. Removing peoples rights to vote? Ok, looney :D
 
speaker pelosi is being charged with destroying a state document and other things.
Good, that was a massive mistake from her in front of 10's of millions of people.

Which was proven on TV.
These are slippery fish.

Bernie is doing very well.....hard luck clinton
With these things, if Bernie wins the first three that usually means he get the nod from the DNC.

But Hillary, the smell that won't go away, hasn't said she is out of the running at all. I still suspect she is going to add herself to the ticket, the more I see about IOWA the more it smells funny. It looks like th DNC is still trying to hurt Bernie.

Now that Biden is tanking, thanks to the impeachment coverage, it could even be a dark horse that gets it.. My prediction: Bloomberg/Hillary of the Dem ticket! It's far out there for sure, but it would be cool if I was right.
 
In the space on one page deuse has; told us they voted for Trump, actually tried to frame Obama adding $10tn to the debt compared to ~$4tn for Trump as a fault of Obama without the most basic of context and seems to actually think Trump is eligible for a third term because of impeachment. Let that sink in, no wonder this thread has been banging heads against rocks for 100 pages.

The icing on the cake? With deuse stating Trump has added $4tn in just over 3 years. That would be ~$1.3tn a year, and 1.3 x 8 years = $10.4tn :p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p. So Trump would be about on par without......you know the biggest financial crisis since the great depression (likely higher if another recession hits). At the very least, he would reach half of the total in half the time. Trump voters/supporters just keep on giving :cool:.
 
Just google the amount of people who have been indicted and locked up under the current corrupt regime. Its there in black and white.
Again, where?

Also you may choose to dismiss evidence due to being extremely biased but you cant refute it.
I said I'll look at anything anyone posts, and if it conflict with my world view I'll think about it.

Here's a point for you.. I was a normie like you over 20 years back, with the same standard beliefs as most of the others on 'your' side. To get from that to what I am now, do you think that took a lot of questioning things? I changed my fundamental beliefs as they didn't match what was happening. I could have ignored it but it knorred at my soul for a couple of years and it was VERY hard to change - I do get that.

Its the reason you are tarred with being a CT nutter.
lol - if you say so. You've made a lot of points with zero evidence posted. Sure your points maybe valid, but without being able to check ANY of them - who knows?

You may not like my views, that's an understatement, but at lease I back up my claims - you, have not..
 
Didn't you SJWs say all this in the trump trial....hmmmmmmm yes you did :)

Say what?

Do you realise how insane the notion of impeachment meaning it resets the term limits is?

That could be completely abused. What if the house and presidency was controlled by the same party and the opposition party did not have 67 senators? As soon as it gets close to the end of a term, the house could impeach, the senate would acquit, and then the presidents term starts again.

That would be utterly bonkers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom