Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jono8 said:
What does it matter if Trump is a foreign asset or not? He was rightfully suspected of being one, hence the investigation (which as per the IG report, and unless you can provide evidence otherwise, was not started due to political bias)
Click to expand...

What do you mean "it doesn't matter if Trump is a Russian asset or not"

Do you still think Trump is a Russian asset? Yes or no?

You've just been given the evidence about political bias, Durham and Barr didn't agree with the conclusions of the IG report, that's all the evidence that any of us have to go on at the moment, until they've concluded the investigations. It's still ongoing, isnt it?
 
Jono8 said:
It's funny because you are saying this sarcastically as if it isn't close to the truth.
Click to expand...

Keep being wrong about everything, it’s hilarious

Jono8 said:
In relation to your question, what does it matter if Trump is a foreign asset or not? He was rightfully suspected of being one, hence the investigation (which as per the IG report, and unless you can provide evidence otherwise, was not started due to political bias)
Click to expand...

The IG had a very narrow scope and was constrained at looking within the DoJ, Barr and Durham has unlimited scope and the evidence they’re sitting on made them come out and say they completely disagreed with Horowitz’ outcome
 
ChrisLX200 said:
They work on the theory that lies+lies+lies=truth
Click to expand...

It's worse than that, these types like to think they're better than people because they "do their own research" or see things that the "sheeple" don't.

The problem is they think they're special, when they are, but in the derogatory sense.
 
Trusty said:
What do you mean "it doesn't matter if Trump is a Russian asset or not"

Do you still think Trump is a Russian asset? Yes or no?
Click to expand...

I dont know.

We will likely never know because of the immense obstruction by Trump (see the Mueller report and the big list of all the times Trump and his admin obstructed the investigation)

Trusty said:
You've just been given the evidence about political bias, Durham and Barr didn't agree with the conclusions of the IG report, that's all the evidence that any of us have to go on at the moment, until they've concluded the investigations. It's still ongoing, isnt it?
Click to expand...

No, for the millionth time, that is not evidence.

People in the FBi having political opinions is not evidence. A few people in the fbi not liking Trump doesn't mean they investigated him because of it. There are likely many people in the us government that hate Trump.

Some people (probably hard to believe as you seem to support Trump) have integrity and can still carry out their jobs professionally even if they ha e a political bias.
 
tang0 said:
Keep being wrong about everything, it’s hilarious



The IG had a very narrow scope and was constrained at looking within the DoJ, Barr and Durham has unlimited scope and the evidence they’re sitting on made them come out and say they completely disagreed with Horowitz’ outcome
Click to expand...

The inspector general found no bias and the DOJ has declined to prosecute McCabe. You are being taken for a ride by Trump. Snap out of it.
 
Jono8 said:
I dont know.

We will likely never know because of the immense obstruction by Trump (see the Mueller report and the big list of all the times Trump and his admin obstructed the investigation)



No, for the millionth time, that is not evidence.

People in the FBi having political opinions is not evidence. A few people in the fbi not liking Trump doesn't mean they investigated him because of it. There are likely many people in the us government that hate Trump.

Some people (probably hard to believe as you seem to support Trump) have integrity and can still carry out their jobs professionally even if they ha e a political bias.
Click to expand...

How is Durham and Barr disagreeing with the IG not evidence? It's the only evidence that me and you have to go off at the moment, the most logical and neutral position to take, is, listen to the people above the IG. They disagreed that with the IG report. I don't know how it'll play out, neither do you. So stop throwing CT at people to discredit what they have to say.

For example, if Biden had made a conclusion about something and Obama came out and disagreed with what Biden said, you would listen to Obama, not Biden.

Its no different with Durham and Barr.
 
Trusty said:
How is Durham and Barr disagreeing with the IG not evidence? It's the only evidence that me and you have to go off at the moment, the most logical and neutral position to take, is, listen to the people above the IG. They disagreed that with the IG report. I don't know how it'll play out, neither do you. So stop throwing CT at people to discredit what they have to say.
Click to expand...

Because one is an independent inspectors report and one is the thoughts inside Trump appointee Barr's head?

:confused:
 
You guys are basing all this on an investigation that has so far released nothing and indicted no one. What happens if Durham doesn't indict anyone? Because you are all claiming people of guilty of things and so far no one has been charged with anything. You are just fully sold on the Trump line that the whole deep state is in some massive conspiracy to get him. If they really wanted to get him they'd have leaked that Trump was under investigation a few days out from the election. That could have crippled him but instead they kept it a secret as was DOJ policy. Yeah they were really out to stop him being elected weren't they :rolleyes: your whole theory makes zero sense.
 
chroniclard said:
Corrupt trump arse licker doesn't agree with something, seems legit.
Click to expand...

Yeah a man who pushed Bush into pardoning 6 people heavily involved in Iran Contra, including the Sec Def before he even stood trial. That from the AG who once again showed himself to be the GOPs lawyer and not the people's lawyer as the AG is supposed to be.
 
"Judiciary Committee's investigation of the initiation of the Russia probe and the FBI's use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to conduct surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page."

"A major aspect of the report exposed the degree to which the FBI had relied on the unverified dossier compiled by ex-British spy Christopher Steele as part of opposition research for Hillary Clinton's campaign."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/graham-reveals-big-questions-he-has-ahead-of-senate-fisa-probe

Pay back time....
 
deuse said:
"Judiciary Committee's investigation of the initiation of the Russia probe and the FBI's use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to conduct surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page."

"A major aspect of the report exposed the degree to which the FBI had relied on the unverified dossier compiled by ex-British spy Christopher Steele as part of opposition research for Hillary Clinton's campaign."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/graham-reveals-big-questions-he-has-ahead-of-senate-fisa-probe

Pay back time....
Click to expand...

Graham and Fox News lol. Come on seriously the man has sold his soul. The IG report said they didn't rely in it so which is it? When AP or the like start saying there is something then we'll see. Until then this just stinks of politics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom