Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jun 2018
- Posts
- 2,827
Said while sitting comfortably in it anticipating movement.I'm not on it....

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Said while sitting comfortably in it anticipating movement.I'm not on it....
Interesting he says wait for November. Seems like AMD were serious about that show of force.
Can we get the hype train out now?
Indeed, if you have a mind to begin withThe fact that AMD will compete in any kind of way will give them mindshare
Personally I think AMD will be competitive with the RTX 3080 rather than the 3090.
Indeed, if you have a mind to begin with![]()
We can't help those people who don't do any research!![]()
Would that include the people that retort its AMD's fault, and then should AMD bring out a equal/better offering.. still buy nvidia?
God I remember that Hype Train WreckRX480 redux?![]()
We can't help those people who don't do any research!![]()
Like a single controller and the instruction manual?Buy a navi RDNA2 GPU and get a percentage of one of the next generation consoles is what I would be pushing if I was amd.
I only recommend Nvidia if they are better price/performance,the others buying worse price/performance Nvidia GPUs and saying its AMD's fault forcing them to do it,well I can't help them either.
Just checking and there's a few that lose their minds that say this and I cant help them too.![]()
Hopium for my Radeon homies
GA104 = RTX 3070 (2944 CUDA cores)
![]()
I find this a little hard to understand what he means with “And GA102 will also pay a huge price”.
Beating GA104 is what most of us would have expected so while it’s nice to have confirmation of sorts I don’t find it all that interesting... what I’m interested in is how it compares to 3080 and 3090 and the terminology he uses is vague... does he mean it’ll be competitive in performance with the GA102 cards or does he just mean it’ll be above GA104 cards in perf but competitive with 102 on a price/perf level but perhaps not on a perf/perf level?
I would have liked him to have just come straight out and said it’s a direct GA102 competitor.
You get them on the CPU side as well, moaning that the 3000 series isn't cheaper by now as if its AMD's fault that Intel are producing expensive carpI only recommend Nvidia if they are better price/performance,the others buying worse price/performance Nvidia GPUs and saying its AMD's fault forcing them to do it,well I can't help them either.
maybe availability is going to be a problem?
You get them on the CPU side as well, moaning that the 3000 series isn't cheaper by now as if its AMD's fault that Intel are producing expensive carp
The 90 will be sparse as hell for a few months, and prices will only go one way.
Most likely.
I find this a little hard to understand what he means with “And GA102 will also pay a huge price”.
Beating GA104 is what most of us would have expected so while it’s nice to have confirmation of sorts I don’t find it all that interesting... what I’m interested in is how it compares to 3080 and 3090 and the terminology he uses is vague... does he mean it’ll be competitive in performance with the GA102 cards or does he just mean it’ll be above GA104 cards in perf but competitive with 102 on a price/perf level but perhaps not on a perf/perf level?
I would have liked him to have just come straight out and said it’s a direct GA102 competitor.