I feel AMD was able to give Intel a spanking because Intel was drip feeding 10% gains each gen of release, which opened the door for AMD to take advantage but and I use the term loosely, I can't see NVidia making the same mistakes as Intel and allowing AMD in with a 3080 beater.... Or do you feel I am wrong on that?
It's a bit different with GPU's as their selling more than just a chip so there are things they can do to refactor a new product with little work such as upping the included VRAM. I think there is some reason why NV released a more significant leap forward this time but I'm sure they haven't released all of the grunt in the new products so could respond with a 3080 super or Ti if AMD beats the 3080. NV wins in some ways by being first to market but also retains a certain amount up it's sleeve in case the competition challenges them. The pressure is on AMD to now put it's best foot forward whilst it has some oversight of what the competition is but it doesn't have the same advantage of dripping out minor gains.