• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Navi 23 ‘NVIDIA Killer’ GPU Rumored to Support Hardware Ray Tracing, Coming Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember these hypocritcs banning together against AMD's Pricing?
@55:01

When it's from Nvidia charging $1200 were was the outcry then? Oh yeah, almost forgot NDA, samples...etc..

I suggest everyone to remember those faces when they review praises of Ampere and their disdain for Radeon.

Wonder if that's before or after they played Soggy Biscuit.
 
So everyone hates AMD reference cards because they are blowers. AMD are fixing this & now it's full on hate because of a bit of red trim? I'd honestly forgotten I was subbed to this muppet.. remedied that straight away:/

I can’t believe how much he ranted about the design... who really cares that much?

To me it just looks average and generic. I think accusing them of copying the Turing FE cards is a hell of a stretch because really it just looks much like any other 3 fan card!

All irrelevant noise to me however because whatever I get it’ll have a water block stuck on it. All I care about is how they perform.
 
He also said he wouldn't accept another amd card for review on the vega launch fiasco with the "time limited" price reduction.
This thread is now a bad episode of EastEnders (correction: they're all bad).

Surely people have better things to do than take serious notice of these "influencer" types?

TechTubers are whores who keep their clothes on
People here seem to lap them up and post their drivel in every single page :p
 
card looks fine to me, however I don't care. I see the side and backplate (or used to before watercooling) and I've never given a flying **** what it looks like... it'll be hilarious if the AMD has some serious grunt and Jay is then saying what a fantastuic card it is BUT looks awful, like 95% of people actually care? I think not... they want Performance per £$ simple as that. It could look like Del Boys Love Truncheon, and no one will care!

if we're judging cards on how they look and that actually matters, wow... I like Jay, watched for years, however this time that is the worst article I think I've seen from him, very very weak tbh... although I watched it simply to see the renders and proper cards... otherwise I'd have turned off.
 
Remember these hypocritcs banning together against AMD's Pricing?
@55:01

When it's from Nvidia charging $1200 were was the outcry then? Oh yeah, almost forgot NDA, samples...etc..

I suggest everyone to remember those faces when they review praises of Ampere and their disdain for Radeon.

Linus was never impressed with the 2080ti prices, infact he didnt recommend any of the RTX cards at launch. Not sure why you think he's such a hypocrite.
 
Not even remotely. Now. Sapphire Pulse I can see, minus the heatpipes.

Yeah, what was i thinking :p

RX_6xxx_b.jpg

QcYBDpxh.jpg



solid reasoning.

Linus said the 2080ti prices were inflated and he didnt recommend the 2070 based on the complete lack of RTX benchmarks available, and LTT ripped Tom's Hardware's 'opinion piece' on why RTX cards were worth the money. But no, he's a hypocrite right?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, what was i thinking :p
So because from 1 single, solitary angle there is similarity in having a fin array recessed into a unibody shroud with some branding slapped on, it looks exactly like a 2080 Ti? Did you count the size, positioning and number of fans? The materials involved? The actual placement, angle and shape of the branding? The second you stop looking at it from the top there is zero resemblance.
 
Why do some ppl want RDNA 2 graphics cards to have HBM2 memory? Memory bandwidth is likely to be the least of the RX 6000 series' problems.

Using HBM2 rather than GDDR6 will just add to the cost too and require more power that could be used for other things like higher clocks or more CUs. Probably better to use a higher spec memory bus to increase memory bandwidth.
 
So because from 1 single, solitary angle there is similarity in having a fin array recessed into a unibody shroud with some branding slapped on, it looks exactly like a 2080 Ti? Did you count the size, positioning and number of fans? The materials involved? The actual placement, angle and shape of the branding? The second you stop looking at it from the top there is zero resemblance.

The fans aren't on the side, they're on the front? I clearly said the side looks very similar, did I not? Why are you trying to be so condescending about something i never mentioned?
 
Why do some ppl want RDNA 2 graphics cards to have HBM2 memory? Memory bandwidth is likely to be the least of the RX 6000 series' problems.

Using HBM2 rather than GDDR6 will just add to the cost too and require more power that could be used for other things like higher clocks or more CUs. Probably better to use a higher spec memory bus to increase memory bandwidth.
HBM actually keeps board power down, so if there's a model that can compete with the 3090 by absolutely clocking the tatas off it, using HBM allows AMD to do exactly what you say: redirect power to higher clocks. Also, when you're already in halo product, £1,000+ levels, the cost of using HBM isn't really an issue but could reap big rewards in memory bandwidth. Nobody is "wanting" HBM on a 3600XT, that's just silly.
 
The fans aren't on the side, they're on the front? I clearly said the side looks very similar, did I not? Why are you trying to be so condescending about something i never mentioned?
Side, front, I always mix up GPU dimensions and references. Not sure what's condescending about giving examples of why it doesn't look like a 2080 Ti, even from the side.
 
Side, front, I always mix up GPU dimensions and references. Not sure what's condescending about giving examples of why it doesn't look like a 2080 Ti, even from the side.

Because you waffled about counting fans and other nonsense as if you think i wouldnt have done that if i was talking about the FRONT of the card. Condescending. But i wasnt talking about the front so that's irrelevant anyway and look, if you can't see how they look so similar then I'm not going to spell it out for you; I've already posted the photos side-by-side. Think it, don't think it - I don't care :)
 
Last edited:
HBM actually keeps board power down, so if there's a model that can compete with the 3090 by absolutely clocking the tatas off it, using HBM allows AMD to do exactly what you say: redirect power to higher clocks. Also, when you're already in halo product, £1,000+ levels, the cost of using HBM isn't really an issue but could reap big rewards in memory bandwidth. Nobody is "wanting" HBM on a 3600XT, that's just silly.

Yeah, it makes sense for a very high end card (e.g. a 'Radeon VIII'), aimed at easily beating an RTX 3080 or even a 3090. It's a question of value really. Ultimately, we might have GDDR7 next year or by 2022, so that would be a cheaper option. HBM2 on the Radeon VII only grants 1,024 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which seems odd. It's an increase but not what you might expect considering the high end memory bus interface.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom