Ryzen clock tuner 2.0

MegaPinches · 3 Feb 2021 at 14:00

Jarrod said:
good stuff. with -5 curve optimizer I averaged 50c idle and 75c all core load (4.5ghz). With ryzen clock tuner I average 30c idle and 78c all core load (4.75ghz) - I'll take 20c lower temps and higher all core over a bit of single core performance!

Why not try the new hybrid oc if you want to preserve single core too?. Not tried it yet, anyone have any results/info on this new feature?. Waiting for AUTO CO on 2.1, don't want to run a fixed oc this 5600x boosts to 5150mhz at -15.

snips86x · 3 Feb 2021 at 14:28

Joxeon said:
You can't use a negative vcore offset if PBO/curve optimiser is enabled.

I actually didn't spot that, thanks for pointing it out

Wingz · 3 Feb 2021 at 15:01

I'm using negative Vcore offset with PBO and Curve enabled, and it still boosts normally, it also helps with my temps gives higher CB20 score.

Just ran a diagnostic but few minutes in my pc rebooted, guess something wasn't stable. It said my 5900X was a Silver sample

Doco · 3 Feb 2021 at 15:10

Just ran the diagnostic on my 5900x

pc-guy · 3 Feb 2021 at 15:19

Wingz said:
I'm using negative Vcore offset with PBO and Curve enabled, and it still boosts normally, it also helps with my temps gives higher CB20 score.

Just ran a diagnostic but few minutes in my pc rebooted, guess something wasn't stable. It said my 5900X was a Silver sample

give it an +25mv see what happens. i noticed the voltage recommendation it gave was unstable for my 3900x in the 1.1 version so i added another increment and stress tested and all good after.

Raiden85 · 3 Feb 2021 at 16:03

Tried it on my 5950x and it said I had a bronze sample, this was on an Asus X570 Formula BIOS 3204 with AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.0

alec · 3 Feb 2021 at 16:26

Meh
Said my 5800X is silver
And that I could hope for 4625MHz at 1325mV

But I already get 4700MHz in CB using only curve optimizer. And that is retaining 4850MHz boost. Why would I use CTR for overclocking?

Joxeon · 3 Feb 2021 at 16:33

alec said:
Meh
Said my 5800X is silver
And that I could hope for 4625MHz at 1325mV

But I already get 4700MHz in CB using only curve optimizer. And that is retaining 4850MHz boost. Why would I use CTR for overclocking?

Maybe it's clock stretching.

MegaPinches · 3 Feb 2021 at 16:33

alec said:
Meh
Said my 5800X is silver
And that I could hope for 4625MHz at 1325mV

But I already get 4700MHz in CB using only curve optimizer. And that is retaining 4850MHz boost. Why would I use CTR for overclocking?

Yea I cant see much value in this, on 3000 series my 3600 never went over the rated boost so it was worth doing as the fixed oc could achieve higher than 4.2 (all core fixed higher than single core boost) and at lower temps but the 5600x flies past its rated boost all way up to 5150 (on 2 cores) and all core can hold 4650-4700. Can't see point running fixed OC, not tried the hybrid OC, sure can prob get multi core clock up at lower temps but rather wait for the Auto Curve feature, that be the nuts for 5000 series and the biggest draw for this tool now.

Josh · 3 Feb 2021 at 16:33

Yeah just tried my silver 5800x at it gives me 4650Mhz at 1.32, but I can run a fixed all core OC @ 4.650Mhz with 1.22 so doesn't seem to have done anything except spend ages doing...nothing.

I'll stick to messing around with curve optimisation and stuff, seems to yield better results for me.

Thekwango · 3 Feb 2021 at 17:13

quick question, does this work with the x370 motherboards? never bothered upgrading the board when i got my 3700x and never really could be bothered to fiddle too much

mattup · 3 Feb 2021 at 17:31

Mine is golden!! First time ever!

Jarrod · 3 Feb 2021 at 18:20

Strange.. the app suddenly wont launch for me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

MegaPinches · 3 Feb 2021 at 18:52

Joxeo [QUOTE="Joxeon said:
Maybe it's clock stretching.

think you only get clock stetching if you have auto multi and lower vcore manual too much, e.g 1.0 vcore still net you high boosts but fake boosts, CO doesnt seem to cause clock stetching (anyone confirm?), you just get a crash when unstable like manual OC which is good if its like that.

MegaPinches · 3 Feb 2021 at 18:52

mattup said:
Mine came out as Golden!!

pff

Doug2507 · 3 Feb 2021 at 19:08

Been in beta since it started, best thing to do right now is ignore it and wait for a fully fleshed out release imo. Early access discord is constant with issues / questions.

Joxeon · 3 Feb 2021 at 19:32

MegaPinches said:
think you only get clock stetching if you have auto multi and lower vcore manual too much, e.g 1.0 vcore still net you high boosts but fake boosts, CO doesnt seem to cause clock stetching (anyone confirm?), you just get a crash when unstable like manual OC which is good if its like that.

The curve may trigger clock stretching to some degree before crashes start to happen, would need to do some bench tests though to see if it indeed does happen.

dante6491 · 3 Feb 2021 at 21:32

Just run it a couple of times on my 3700x/x570 Taichi and it did not crash so huge improvement.

What did not improve at all was my results. At stock I apparently got a Cinebench R20 of 4861.

Following the guide, I did the diagnostics, filled the default settings and waited. P1 profile ended up with a reduction in Watts from 88 to 80, and a reduction in score to 4776. Ran it again for P2 and got an increase in Watts to 103.4 and a score of 4808. Tuned is pretty awful then...

pc-guy · 3 Feb 2021 at 21:35

i am gonna do a run of it over the weekend as I need my PC for work so cant be messing with it now

i am still on 1.1.8.0 agesa so will use the current bios for now and see if anything improves. if not I will load up 1.2.0.0 agesa and test.

Arron17 · 4 Feb 2021 at 00:54

Been having a play with this with my 5900x and it seems like it can get really good results, although I've not done full stability testing yet.

I went through the instructions and had these as my P1 and P2 with the Hybrid OC

P1:
CCX1 (158): 4425 MHz, 1181 mV OC=
CCX2 (133): 4325 MHz, 1181 mV OC=

P2:
CCX1 (158): 4550 MHz, 1288 mV OC=
CCX2 (133): 4500 MHz, 1288 mV OC=

And then I thought I'd do some runs with Cinebench R23 and compare with Stock and with PBO and these are the results, all readings HWInfo64, voltages are from CPU Core VID (Effective).

Stock:
Score: 20205
Voltage: 1.181v
Clock: 3.975ghz both CCX
Temp: 70.6c
Power: 130w

PBO:
Score: 21606
Voltage: 1.325v
Clock: 4.3ghz both CCX
Temp: 87c
Power: 180w

CTR:
Score: 22398
Voltage 1.181v
Clock: CCX1 - 4.425ghz, CCX2 4.325ghz
Temp - 74c
Power - 140w

So a decent amount better than PBO with stock power limits, 400mhz jump over stock with the same voltages.

My thoughts as well are that if PBO will happly run 1.325v at full load, then I could use that voltage in CTR and get even better results. However I'm a bit reluctant to push it that high, as it doesn't use FIT so could put too much voltage through and cause degradation.